Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 1;109(9):2614-2623.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000495.

The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a cross sectional study

Affiliations

The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a cross sectional study

Yung-Yeh Su et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Upfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. There is increasing evidence suggesting favourable outcomes toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery.

Methods: All clinical staging with resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated at a tertiary medical centre from 2013 to 2020 were identified. The baseline characteristics, treatment course, surgery outcome and survival results of UR or NAC were compared.

Results: Finally, in 159 resectable patients, 46 patients (29%) underwent NAC and 113 patients (71%) received UR. In NAC, 11 patients (24%) did not receive resection, 4 (36.4%) for comorbidity, 2 (18.2%) for patient refusal and 2 (18.2%) for disease progression. In UR, 13 patients (12%) were unresectable intraoperatively; 6 (46.2%) for locally advanced and 5 (38.5%) for distant metastasis. Overall, 97% of patients in NAC and 58% of patients in UR completed adjuvant chemotherapy. As of data cut-off, 24 patients (69%) in NAC and 42 patients (29%) in UR were still tumour free. The median recurrence-free survival in NAC, UR with adjuvant chemotherapy and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 31.3 months (95% CI, 14.4-not estimable), 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.8), P =0.036; and the median overall survival in each group were not reached (95% CI, 29.7-not estimable), 25.9 months (95% CI, 21.1-40.5) and 21.7 months (12.0-32.8), P =0.0053. Based on initial clinical staging, the median overall survival of NAC was not significantly different from UR with a tumour less than or equal to 2 cm, P =0.29. NAC patients had a higher R0 resection rate (83% versus 53%), lower recurrence rate (31% versus 71%) and harvested median number lymph node (23 versus 15).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05700188.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart of pancreatic cancer patients treated at a tertiary medical centre. PDAC, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Kaplan–Meier curve of progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) of the intention-to-treatment population in NAC and UR groups, and further stratified by tumour size (C, D). NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; UR, upfront resection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Recurrence-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) in resected patients in NAC and UR groups. (C) Recurrence-free survival in the NAC group stratified by tumour response grade. (D) The change of clinical staging and pathological staging. Recurrence-free survival (E) and overall survival (F) in resectable pancreatic cancer patients based on the pathology staging. NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; TRG, tumour response grade; UR, upfront resection.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Treatment outcome after covariates adjustment. Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) of upfront resection and neoadjuvant chemotherapy group after propensity score matching. (C) Forest plot of the Cox proportional hazard model of progression-free survival and overall survival. Blue dots represented hazard ratio (HR) and the grey line indicated a 95% CI. The grey dot indicated the reference group.

Comment in

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Wehner MR, Matrisian LM, et al. . Estimated Projection of US Cancer Incidence and Death to 2040. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e214708. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, et al. . Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2020;395:2008–2020. - PubMed
    1. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. . FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2395–2406. - PubMed
    1. Snyder RA, Parikh AA. Actual survival in patients with resected pancreatic cancer: how do real-world data compare with clinical trial evidence? Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:8014–8016. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data