Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jul 1;32(4):388-390.
doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000812. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Controversies and strengths of robot-assisted mastectomy

Joo Heung Kim  1 , Antonio Toesca  2 , Giada Pozzi  2 , Guglielmo Gazzetta  2 , Emilia Marrazzo  3 , Hyung Seok Park  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Controversies and strengths of robot-assisted mastectomy

Joo Heung Kim et al. Eur J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is used to improve cosmetic outcomes while maintaining oncological safety in patients with early breast cancer; however, NSM requires a higher level of skill and workload than mastectomy and is associated with long, visible scars. Robotic surgical systems reduce surgeon workload and facilitate precise surgery. Considering the increasing support of robot-assisted NSM (RNSM), this paper aims to discuss the current controversies based on the research findings reported thus far. There are four concerns regarding RNSM; increased cost, oncological outcomes, the level of experience and skill, and standardization. It should be noted that RNSM is not a surgery performed on all patients but rather a procedure performed on selected patients who meet specific indications. A large-scale randomized clinical trial comparing robotic and conventional NSM has recently begun in Korea; therefore, it is necessary to wait for these results for more insight into oncological outcomes. Although the level of experience and skill required for robotic mastectomy may not be easily achieved by all surgeons, the learning curve for RNSM appears manageable and can be overcome with appropriate training and practice. Training programs and standardization efforts will help improve the overall quality of RNSM. There are some advantages to RNSM. The robotic system provides improved precision and accuracy, helping remove breast tissue more effectively. RNSM has advantages such as smaller scars, less blood loss, and a lower rate of surgical complications. Patients who undergo RNSM report better quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, Siu KC, Oleynikov D; SAGES Robotic Task Force (2020). A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367.
    1. Griepsma M, de Roy van Zuidewijn DB, Grond AJ, Siesling S, Groen H, de Bock GH (2014). Residual breast tissue after mastectomy: how often and where is it located? Ann Surg Oncol 21:1260–1266.
    1. Jackson RS, Sanders T, Park A, Buras R, Liang W, Harris C, et al. (2017). Prospective study comparing surgeons’ pain and fatigue associated with nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3024–3031.
    1. Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL, Chen CJ, Lin YL, Pai SH, et al. (2019). Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: technique, preliminary results and patient-reported cosmetic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 26:42–52.
    1. Lai HW, Chen ST, Mok CW, Lin YJ, Wu HK, Lin SL, et al2020a). Robotic versus conventional nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate gel implant breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer – a case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcome, medical cost, and patient-reported cosmetic results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73:1514–1525.

Publication types