Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 26:20:53.
eCollection 2023.

Marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and the conventional method: An in vitro study

Affiliations

Marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and the conventional method: An in vitro study

Sina Jamshidi et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). .

Abstract

Background: Marginal fit is a key factor in success of prosthetic restorations. This study aimed to assess and compare the marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three-dimensional (3D) printing and the conventional method.

Materials and methods: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 20 endocrowns, of which 10 were fabricated by 3D printing and 10 were fabricated by the conventional wax-up technique. The marginal gap was measured at 8 points under a stereomicroscope. The results were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, paired t-test, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).

Results: The mean marginal gap was maximum at the distal point, and minimum at the buccal point for the conventionally fabricated endocrowns with an overall mean marginal gap of 99.67 ± 4.59 μm. The mean marginal gap was maximum at the mesiobuccal and minimum at the buccal point before pressing (overall mean of 103.92 ± 2.19 μm) before pressing, and maximum at the distobuccal and minimum at the mesiobuccal point after pressing (overall mean of 117.67 ± 2.87 μm). According to paired t-test, the mean marginal gap of endocrowns fabricated by 3D printing significantly increased after pressing at all 8 points and also in general, compared with before pressing (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean marginal gap at all points was significantly greater in endocrowns fabricated by 3D printing compared with those fabricated by the conventional method (independent t-test, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results showed that endocrowns fabricated by the conventional method had significantly superior marginal fit than those fabricated by 3D printing.

Keywords: Dental marginal adaptation; dental prosthesis; printing; three-dimensional.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic view of an endocrown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measuring the marginal gap under a stereomicroscope (×10 magnification).

References

    1. Sevimli G, Cengiz S, Oruc MS. Endocrowns: Review. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2015;49:57–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geramipanah F, Fazel A, Hajmahmoudi MR. Evaluation of collar effect on marginal form differences of base metal crowns. J Beheshti Med Univ. 1379;13:53–61.
    1. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:459–64. - PubMed
    1. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:753–8. - PubMed
    1. Dalloul R, Nassar JA, Al-Houri N. A comparative study of marginal fit between IPS e. max press crown and endocrown after cementation (in vitro) Clin Med Diagn. 2016;6:122–5.

LinkOut - more resources