Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 25:10:1187809.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1187809. eCollection 2023.

Return to work after sepsis-a German population-based health claims study

Affiliations

Return to work after sepsis-a German population-based health claims study

Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Long-term impairments after sepsis can impede the return to work in survivors. We aimed to describe rates of return to work 6 and 12 months postsepsis.

Methods: This retrospective, population-based cohort study was based on health claims data of the German AOK health insurance of 23.0 million beneficiaries. We included 12-months survivors after hospital-treated sepsis in 2013/2014, who were ≤60 years at the time of the admission and were working in the year presepsis. We assessed the prevalence of return to work (RTW), persistent inability to work and early retirement.

Results: Among 7,370 working age sepsis survivors, 69.2% returned to work at 6 months postsepsis, while 22.8% were on sick leave and 8.0% retired early. At 12 months postsepsis, the RTW rate increased to 76.9%, whereas 9.8% were still on sick leave and 13.3% retired early. Survivors who returned to work had a mean of 70 (SD 93) sick leave days in the 12 months presepsis (median 28 days, IQR 108 days).

Conclusion: One out of four working age sepsis survivors does not resume work in the year postsepsis. Specific rehabilitation and targeted aftercare may be opportunities to reduce barriers to RTW after sepsis.

Keywords: post-sepsis-syndrome; return to work; sepsis; septic shock; survivor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of study inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Return to work rates among all and subgroups of patients at 6 and 12 months post-sepsis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Duration of sick leave among all sepsis patients and subgroups in the first year after sepsis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overlap in cognitive, medical and psychological impairments in survivors without (left) and with (right) return to work 12 months after sepsis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. . Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. (2020) 395:200–11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med. (2006) 34:15–21. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000194535.82812.ba - DOI - PubMed
    1. Konig C, Matt B, Kortgen A, Turnbull AE, Hartog CS. What matters most to sepsis survivors: a qualitative analysis to identify specific health-related quality of life domains. Qual Life Res. (2019) 28:637–47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2028-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing recovery from Sepsis: a review. JAMA. (2018) 319:62–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Rose N, Freytag A, Spoden M, Prescott HC, Schettler A, et al. . Epidemiology and costs of Postsepsis morbidity, nursing care dependency, and mortality in Germany, 2013 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e2134290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34290, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources