Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 25:13:1169119.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1169119. eCollection 2023.

Causal associations between human gut microbiota and cholelithiasis: a mendelian randomization study

Affiliations

Causal associations between human gut microbiota and cholelithiasis: a mendelian randomization study

Wei Li et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: There was some evidence that gut microbiota was closely related to cholelithiasis, but the causal relationship between them remained unclear. In this study, we try to use Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to clarify the potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and cholelithiasis.

Methods: Summary Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) statistical data for gut microbiota was obtained from MiBioGen, and the data of cholelithiasis was obtained from UK Biobank (UKB). Two-sample MR analyses were performed to assess causalities between gut microbiota and cholelithiasis mainly using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine the robustness of the MR results. Reverse MR analyses were performed to examine the reverse causal association.

Results: Our research results, based primarily on the IVW method, support the existence of a causal relationship between nine gut microbial taxa and cholelithiasis. We observed a positive association between Genus Butyrivibrio (p=0.032), Genus Lachnospiraceae_UCG_001 (p=0.015), Genus Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group (p=0.003), Genus Ruminococcaceae_UCG_011 (p=0.010) and cholelithiasis, while Order Rhodospirillales (p=0.031), Genus Actinomyces (p=0.010), Genus Phascolarctobacterium (p=0.036), Genus Rikenellaceae_RC9_gutgroup (p=0.023), Genus Ruminococcaceae_UCG_013 (p=0.022) may be associated with a reduced risk of cholelithiasis. We did not find a reverse causal relationship between cholelithiasis and 9 specific gut microbial taxa.

Conclusions: This is the first mendelian randomization study to explore the causalities between specific gut microbiota taxa and cholelithiasis, which may provide new ideas and a theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of cholelithiasis in the future.

Keywords: gut microbiota; causality; cholelithiasis; genetic association; mendelian randomization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Three assumptions of Mendelian randomization. (B) Flowchart of this Mendelian randomization study. GWAS, Genome Wide Association Studies; IV, Instrumental variable; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MR, Mendelian randomization; IVW, Inverse-variance weighted; WM, Weighted median; UKB, UK Biobank.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the associations between genetically determined 9 gut microbial genera with the risks of cholelithiasis in UKB. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SE, Standard Error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bowden J., Davey S. G., Burgess S. (2015). Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through egger regression. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44 (2), 512–525. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowden J., Del Greco M. F., Minelli C., Davey Smith G., Sheehan N., Thompson J. A. (2017). A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data mendelian randomization. Stat. Med. 36 (11), 1783–1802. doi: 10.1002/sim.7221 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowden J., Holmes M. V. (2019). Meta-analysis and mendelian randomization: a review. Res. Synth. Methods 10 (4), 486–496. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1346 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgess S., Thompson S. G. (2011). Avoiding bias from weak instruments in mendelian randomization studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40 (3), 755–764. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen M., Xie C. R., Shi Y. Z., Tang T. C., Zheng H. (2022). Gut microbiota and major depressive disorder: a bidirectional mendelian randomization. J. Affect. Disord. 316, 187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.012 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types