Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 30;12(5):816-826.
doi: 10.21037/tp-22-569. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Comparison of telerobotic and conventional ultrasonography in children: a crossover bicentric pilot study

Affiliations

Comparison of telerobotic and conventional ultrasonography in children: a crossover bicentric pilot study

Celine Delestrain et al. Transl Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: The MELODY system allows for performing ultrasonography on a patient remotely and has been proposed to assess disease characteristics in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this interventional crossover study was to address the feasibility of the system in children aged 1 to 10 years old.

Methods: Children underwent ultrasonography with a telerobotic ultrasound system followed by a second conventional examination by a different sonographer.

Results: In total, 38 children were enrolled, and 76 examinations were performed, with 76 scans analyzed. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age of participants was 5.7 (2.7) years (range, 1-10 years). We found substantial agreement between telerobotic and conventional ultrasonography [κ=0.74 (95% CI: 0.53-0.94), P<0.005]. The mean (SD) duration was longer for telerobotic than conventional examinations [26.0 (2.5) vs. 13.9 (11.2) min, P<0.0001]. Abdominal organs and abnormalities were similarly visualized on telerobotic and conventional ultrasonography. Cardiac echocardiography provided reliable diagnoses, with non-significantly different measurements with both techniques, although the visualization score was significantly higher with conventional than telerobotic ultrasonography (P<0.05). On lung analysis, both examinations identified consolidations and pleural effusion, whereas visualization and total lung score were similar with the 2 techniques. Overall, 45% of parents reported that their children felt less pressure with the telerobotic system.

Conclusions: Telerobotic ultrasonography may be effective, feasible, and well-tolerated in children.

Keywords: Ultrasound echography; children; robot; telemedicine; telerobotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-22-569/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
System and service architecture of MELODY remote system. The MELODY Patient System consists of a robot, a control panel, and a floor stand. The ultrasound transducer is clamped to the robot. The control panel is connected to the internet and receives signals from the expert site. The signals are translated and sent to the servo motors on the robot, which in turn move the transducer, mimicking the motion of the expert radiologist at the expert site. The videoconferencing system is ideally suited to a tele-ultrasound examination, offering simple operation and excellent communication regarding placement of the robot and the child between the patient and expert sites. The MELODY Expert system consists of a mini control panel and a fictive probe. The shape of the fictive probe resembles an ultrasound transducer and is held and moved by the expert as they might use an ultrasound transducer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adaptation of the MELODY system for children. To facilitate the acceptability of the device by children, the patient assistants were pediatric caregivers with specific skills in using the MELODY system with children (A). The patient site was redesigned with wall stickers for children (B,C). To reduce the system pressure on the child’s chest, a soft material was added under the base of the robot (A) and a new protocol for fixing the probe was implemented (D).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart of the participants in the study.

References

    1. Marin JR, Lewiss RE, American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, et al . Point-of-care ultrasonography by pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Pediatrics 2015;135:e1113-22. 10.1542/peds.2015-0343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joshi P, Vasishta A, Gupta M. Ultrasound of the pediatric chest. Br J Radiol 2019;92:20190058. 10.1259/bjr.20190058 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah VP, Tunik MG, Tsung JW. Prospective evaluation of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children and young adults. JAMA Pediatr 2013;167:119-25. 10.1001/2013.jamapediatrics.107 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caiulo VA, Gargani L, Caiulo S, et al. Lung ultrasound in bronchiolitis: comparison with chest X-ray. Eur J Pediatr 2011;170:1427-33. 10.1007/s00431-011-1461-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Ceano-Vivas M, Martín-Espín I, Del Rosal T, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in ambulatory and hospitalised Spanish children. Arch Dis Child 2020;105:808-9. 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed