Comparison of positive pressure extubation with traditional extubation in critically ill patients - a randomised control study
- PMID: 37306270
- PMCID: PMC10156539
- DOI: 10.5114/ait.2023.125584
Comparison of positive pressure extubation with traditional extubation in critically ill patients - a randomised control study
Abstract
Background: Two extubation methods are commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU): the traditional method with endotracheal suctioning and the positive- pressure method without suctioning. Better physiological outcomes were found in lab studies using the latter, as the air passing between the endotracheal tube and the larynx pushes out the collected subglottic secretions, which can be suctioned.
Methods: 70 mechanically ventilated patients in a tertiary ICU were randomised into 2 groups of 35 patients each. At the end of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), the positive pressure extubation (PPE) group was given a pressure support of 15 cm H 2 O and a positive end expiratory pressure of 10 cm H 2 O for 5 minutes while the other group (traditional extubation - TE) was extubated directly. We compared the lung ultrasound scores (LUS), chest X-ray findings, alveolar arterial oxygen gradient changes, adverse clinical events, ICU-free days and reintubation rates between the two groups.
Results: Median LUS at the end of the SBT was similar between the two groups. However, the median post-extubation LUS at 30 minutes, 6 hours, 24 hours in the PPE group [5 (4-8) ( P = 0.04), 5 (3-8) ( P = 0.02), 4 (3-7) ( P = 0.02), respectively] were significantly lower compared to the TE group [6 (6-8), 6 (5-7.5), 6 (5-7.5), respectively]. There was a persistent lowering of the scores even at the end of 24 hours in the PPE group, while the percentage of patients without adverse clinical events was significantly higher (80% vs. 57.14%, P = 0.04).
Conclusions: The study shows that positive pressure extubation is a safe procedure which improves aeration and reduces adverse events.
Keywords: lung ultrasound; positive pressure extubation; traditional extubation; mechanical ventilation.
Conflict of interest statement
none.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Effect of Reconnection to Mechanical Ventilation for 1 Hour After Spontaneous Breathing Trial on Reintubation Among Patients Ventilated for More Than 12 Hours: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.064. Epub 2021 Mar 4. Chest. 2021. PMID: 33676997 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between pressure support ventilation and T-piece in spontaneous breathing trials.Respir Res. 2022 Feb 7;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01942-w. Respir Res. 2022. PMID: 35130914 Free PMC article.
-
Prophetic values of lung ultrasound score on post-extubation distress in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Eur J Med Res. 2022 Feb 22;27(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00652-9. Eur J Med Res. 2022. PMID: 35193686 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of T-piece and pressure support ventilation as spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2020 Feb 26;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2764-3. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32102693 Free PMC article.
-
[Summary of the best evidence for the management of endotracheal intubation and extubation in adult mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit based on guidelines and randomized controlled trials].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Aug;33(8):927-932. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210412-00536. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021. PMID: 34590558 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Applying positive end-expiratory pressure before and during endotracheal tube removal versus extubation with concomitant aspiration: protocol for the randomised controlled multicentre EXSUPEEP trial.BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 13;15(2):e092354. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092354. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39947817 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the effects of pressure support ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure during extubation on respiratory system complications.Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Dec 18;13(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00477-6. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39696646 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous