Induction or spontaneous labor for pregnant patients on anticoagulants?

Abstract

Objective: There are two approaches to peripartum management for pregnant patients undergoing anticoagulation treatments: spontaneous labor or scheduling an induction. A long interval without anticoagulation is a thrombosis risk factor, while a short interval leads to risks of delivery without epidural analgesia or post partum hemorrhage. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of planned induction versus spontaneous labor on obtaining neuraxial analgesia.

Materials and methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted from 2012 to 2020 including all patients on preventive or curative low molecular-weight heparin at the time of delivery, excluding planned cesarean sections. The rates of neuraxial analgesia were compared between two groups: spontaneous labor and induction, as well as the intervals without anticoagulants.

Results: 127 patients were included. In the spontaneous labor group, 78% (44/56) received neuraxial analgesia versus 88% (37/42) in the induction group (p = 0.29). For curative dose treatment, the rate of neuraxial analgesia was 45,5% in the spontaneous group versus 78,6% (p = 0.12). The median time without anticoagulation was 34 h [26-46] in the spontaneous labor group and 43 h [34-54] in the induction group (p = 0.01), without an increased incidence of thrombosis. The rate of postpartum hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion: Planned induction tended to increase the rate of neuraxial analgesia, without reaching significance, and most women in spontaneous labor accessed analgesia. Peripartum management should be a shared decision with the patient considering the obstetrical and thrombosis risk context for each patient.

Keywords: Anticoagulants; Induction; Low-molecular weight heparin; Pregnancy; Thromboprophylaxis.