Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 30;42(19):3443-3466.
doi: 10.1002/sim.9813. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

Defining and estimating effects in cluster randomized trials: A methods comparison

Affiliations
Review

Defining and estimating effects in cluster randomized trials: A methods comparison

Alejandra Benitez et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

Across research disciplines, cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are commonly implemented to evaluate interventions delivered to groups of participants, such as communities and clinics. Despite advances in the design and analysis of CRTs, several challenges remain. First, there are many possible ways to specify the causal effect of interest (eg, at the individual-level or at the cluster-level). Second, the theoretical and practical performance of common methods for CRT analysis remain poorly understood. Here, we present a general framework to formally define an array of causal effects in terms of summary measures of counterfactual outcomes. Next, we provide a comprehensive overview of CRT estimators, including the t-test, generalized estimating equations (GEE), augmented-GEE, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). Using finite sample simulations, we illustrate the practical performance of these estimators for different causal effects and when, as commonly occurs, there are limited numbers of clusters of different sizes. Finally, our application to data from the Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi) study demonstrates the real-world impact of varying cluster sizes and targeting effects at the cluster-level or at the individual-level. Specifically, the relative effect of the PTBi intervention was 0.81 at the cluster-level, corresponding to a 19% reduction in outcome incidence, and was 0.66 at the individual-level, corresponding to a 34% reduction in outcome risk. Given its flexibility to estimate a variety of user-specified effects and ability to adaptively adjust for covariates for precision gains while maintaining Type-I error control, we conclude TMLE is a promising tool for CRT analysis.

Keywords: Hierarchical data; cluster randomized trials; clustered data; data-adaptive adjustment; group randomized trials; targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Scatter plot of cluster size Nj by the cumulative incidence of preterm mortality and trial arm in Preterm Birth Initiative.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster Randomised Trials. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2017.
    1. Turner EL, Li F, Gallis JA, Prague M, Murray DM. Review of recent methodological developments in group-randomized trials: part 1—design. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:907–915. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner EL, Prague M, Gallis JA, Li F, Murray DM. Review of recent methodological developments in group-randomized trials: part 2—analysis. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crespi CM. Improved designs for cluster randomized trials. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37(1):1–16. - PubMed
    1. Murray DM, Taljaard M, Turner EL, George SM. Essential ingredients and innovations in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020;41:1–19. - PubMed

Publication types