Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;130(12):1571-1578.
doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02663-0. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

Clinimetrics of the Italian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in adult-onset idiopathic focal dystonia

Affiliations

Clinimetrics of the Italian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in adult-onset idiopathic focal dystonia

Alfonsina D'Iorio et al. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023 Dec.

Abstract

This study aimed at assessing the clinimetrics of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an Italian cohort of patients with adult-onset idiopathic focal dystonia (AOIFD). N = 86 AOIFD patients and N = 92 healthy controls (HCs) were administered the MoCA. Patients further underwent the Trail-Making Test (TMT) and Babcock Memory Test (BMT), being also screened via the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS). Factorial structure and internal consistency were assessed. Construct validity was tested against TMT, BMT, BDI-II and DAS scores, whilst diagnostics against the co-occurrence of a defective performance on at least one TMT measure and on the BMT. Case-control discrimination was examined. The association between MoCA scores and motor-functional measures was explored. The MoCA was underpinned by a mono-component structure and acceptably reliable at an internal level. It converged towards TMT and BMT scores, as well as with the DAS, whilst diverging from the BDI-II. Its adjusted scores accurately detected cognitive impairment (AUC = .86) at a cut-off of < 17.212. The MoCA discriminated patients from HCs (p < .001). Finally, it was unrelated to disease duration and severity, as well as to motor phenotypes. The Italian MoCA is a valid, diagnostically sound and feasible cognitive screener in AOIFD patients.

Keywords: Cognitive screening; Dystonia; Hyperkinetic; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Movement disorders; Neuropsychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

V. S. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from AveXis, Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, Liquidweb S.r.l., Novartis Pharma AG and Zambon, receives or has received research supports from the Italian Ministry of Health, AriSLA, and E-Rare Joint Transnational Call. He is in the Editorial Board of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, European Neurology, American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Frontiers in Neurology and Exploration of Neuroprotective Therapy. B.P. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Liquidweb S.r.l B.P is Associated Editor for Frontiers in Neuroscience. N. T. received compensation for consulting services from Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and Zambon Biotech SA.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curves for raw and adjusted MoCA scores. ROC receiver-operating characteristics, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Raw scores (cut-off: ≤ 20): AUC = 0.89; SE = 0.05; CI 95% [0.79, 0.99]; adjusted scores (cut-off: < 17.212): AUC = 0.86; SE = 0.07; CI 95% [0.74, 0.99]. MoCA scores were adjusted according to Aiello et al. (2022a)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiello EN, Gramegna C, Esposito A, Gazzaniga V, Zago S, Difonzo T, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): updated norms and psychometric insights into adaptive testing from healthy individuals in Northern Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34:375–382. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01943-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiello EN, Rimoldi S, Bolognini N, Appollonio I, Arcara G. Psychometrics and diagnostics of Italian cognitive screening tests: a systematic review. Neurol Sci. 2022;43:821–845. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05683-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aita SL, Del Bene VA, Marotta DA, Pizer JH, Hawley NA, Niccolai L, et al. Neuropsychological functioning in primary dystonia: updated and expanded multidomain meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2022;37:1483–1494. doi: 10.1002/mds.29022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, DeLong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013;28:863–873. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aliling NB, Rivera AS, Jamora RDG. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the hiligaynon montreal cognitive assessment tool (MoCA-Hil) among patients with X-linked dystonia Parkinsonism (XDP) Front Neurol. 2019;10:1249. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01249. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types