Distinct neural networks predict cocaine versus cannabis treatment outcomes
- PMID: 37308679
- PMCID: PMC10713861
- DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02120-0
Distinct neural networks predict cocaine versus cannabis treatment outcomes
Abstract
Treatment outcomes for individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) are variable and more individualized approaches may be needed. Cross-validated, machine-learning methods are well-suited for probing neural mechanisms of treatment outcomes. Our prior work applied one such approach, connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM), to identify dissociable and substance-specific neural networks of cocaine and opioid abstinence. In Study 1, we aimed to replicate and extend prior work by testing the predictive ability of the cocaine network in an independent sample of 43 participants from a trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for SUD, and evaluating its ability to predict cannabis abstinence. In Study 2, CPM was applied to identify an independent cannabis abstinence network. Additional participants were identified for a combined sample of 33 with cannabis-use disorder. Participants underwent fMRI scanning before and after treatment. Additional samples of 53 individuals with co-occurring cocaine and opioid-use disorders and 38 comparison subjects were used to assess substance specificity and network strength relative to participants without SUDs. Results demonstrated a second external replication of the cocaine network predicting future cocaine abstinence, however it did not generalize to cannabis abstinence. An independent CPM identified a novel cannabis abstinence network, which was (i) anatomically distinct from the cocaine network, (ii) specific for predicting cannabis abstinence, and for which (iii) network strength was significantly stronger in treatment responders relative to control particpants. Results provide further evidence for substance specificity of neural predictors of abstinence and provide insight into neural mechanisms of successful cannabis treatment, thereby identifying novel treatment targets. Clinical trials registation: "Computer-based training in cognitive-behavioral therapy web-based (Man VS Machine)", registration number: NCT01442597 . "Maximizing the Efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Contingency Management", registration number: NCT00350649 . "Computer-Based Training in Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT4CBT)", registration number: NCT01406899 .
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Lichenstein, Kohler and Ye report no competing financial interests in relation to the work described. Dr. Potenza has consulted for Opiant Therapeutics, Game Day Data, Baria-Tek, the Addiction Policy Forum, AXA and Idorsia Pharmaceuticals; has been involved in a patent application with Yale University and Novartis; has received research support from Mohegan Sun Casino and the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling; has participated in surveys, mailings or telephone consultations related to drug addiction, impulse-control disorders or other health topics; has consulted for and/or advised gambling and legal entities on issues related to impulse-control/addictive disorders; has provided clinical care in a problem gambling services program; has performed grant reviews for research-funding agencies; has edited journals and journal sections; has given academic lectures in grand rounds, CME events and other clinical or scientific venues; and has generated books or book chapters for publishers of mental health texts. Dr. Kiluk is a consultant to CBT4CBT LLC, which makes versions of CBT4CBT (one of the treatments evaluated in the parent RCTs included in this study) available to qualified clinical providers and organizations on a commercial basis. Dr. Yip is a consultant for Sparian Biosciences.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 15;2(2):CD011866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38357958 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27149547 Free PMC article.
-
Mindfulness-based interventions for substance use disorders.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 20;10(10):CD011723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011723.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34668188 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27040448 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for tobacco use cessation in people in treatment for or recovery from substance use disorders.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):CD010274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010274.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27878808 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Connectome-based encoding of subjective drug responses to acute oral methamphetamine.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02215-y. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025. PMID: 40866561
-
Spatial Craving Patterns in Marijuana Users: Insights From fMRI Brain Connectivity Analysis With High-Order Graph Attention Neural Networks.IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2025 Jan;29(1):358-370. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3462371. Epub 2025 Jan 7. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2025. PMID: 39321007 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and External Validation of a Problem Cannabis Risk Network.Biol Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 3:S0006-3223(25)00065-4. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.01.022. Online ahead of print. Biol Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 39909136
References
-
- Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):179–87. - PubMed
-
- Hayes A, Herlinger K, Paterson L, Lingford-Hughes A. The neurobiology of substance use and addiction: evidence from neuroimaging and relevance to treatment. Bjpsych Adv. 2020;26(6):367–78.