Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;26(5):1854-1862.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13782. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model

Affiliations

Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model

Mathieu Bisson et al. Health Expect. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Growing evidence supports patient engagement (PE) in health implementation research to improve the quality, relevance and uptake of research. However, more guidance is needed to plan and operationalize PE before and throughout the research process. The aim of the study was to develop a logic model illustrating the causal links between context, resources, activities, outcomes and impact of PE in an implementation research programme.

Methods: The Patient Engagement in Health Implementation Research Logic Model (hereafter the Logic Model) was developed using a descriptive qualitative design with a participatory approach, in the context of the PriCARE programme. This programme aims to implement and evaluate case management for individuals who frequently use healthcare services in primary care clinics across five Canadian provinces. Participant observation of team meetings was performed by all team members involved in the programme and in-depth interviews were conducted by two external research assistants with team members (n = 22). A deductive thematic analysis using components of logic models as coding categories was conducted. Data were pooled in the first version of the Logic Model, which was refined in research team meetings with patient partners. The final version was validated by all team members.

Results: The Logic Model highlights the importance of integrating PE into the project before its commencement, with appropriate support in terms of funding and time allocation. The governance structure and leadership of both principal investigators and patient partners have significant effects on PE activities and outcomes. As an empirical and standardized illustration that facilitates a shared understanding, the Logic Model provides guidance for maximizing the impact of patient partnership in various contexts for research, patients, providers and health care.

Conclusion: The Logic Model will help academic researchers, decision makers and patient partners plan, operationalize, and assess PE in implementation research for optimal outcomes.

Patient or public contribution: Patient partners from the PriCARE research programme contributed to developing the research objectives and designing, developing and validating data collection tools, producing data, developing and validating the Logic Model and reviewing the manuscript.

Keywords: health implementation research; logic model; patient engagement; patient involvement; patient partnership in research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient engagement in health implementation research logic model.

References

    1. Wicks P, Richards T, Denegri S, Godlee F. Patients' roles and rights in research. BMJ. 2018;362:k3193. - PubMed
    1. Bhati DK, Fitzgerald M, Kendall C, Dahrouge S. Patients' engagement in primary care research: a case study in a Canadian context. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6(1):65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research . SPOR SUPPORT Units. 2021. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/45859.html
    1. Jinks C, Carter P, Rhodes C, et al. Patient and public involvement in primary care research—an example of ensuring its sustainability. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding