Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 17;41(5):33.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-021-01221-4. eCollection 2021 May.

Diversifying maize genomic selection models

Affiliations

Diversifying maize genomic selection models

Brian R Rice et al. Mol Breed. .

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is one of the most powerful tools available for maize breeding. Its use of genome-wide marker data to estimate breeding values translates to increased genetic gains with fewer breeding cycles. In this review, we cover the history of GS and highlight particular milestones during its adaptation to maize breeding. We discuss how GS can be applied to developing superior maize inbreds and hybrids. Additionally, we characterize refinements in GS models that could enable the encapsulation of non-additive genetic effects, genotype by environment interactions, and multiple levels of the biological hierarchy, all of which could ultimately result in more accurate predictions of breeding values. Finally, we suggest the stages in a maize breeding program where it would be beneficial to apply GS. Given the current sophistication of high-throughput phenotypic, genotypic, and other -omic level data currently available to the maize community, now is the time to explore the implications of their incorporation into GS models and thus ensure that genetic gains are being achieved as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Keywords: GBLUP; Genomic selection; Hybrid prediction; Maize; Multi-kernel; Omics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Biological hierarchy in genomic selection. Schematic of how various levels of the biological hierarchy of traits could be incorporated into GS models. The availability of the genomic (red), transcriptomic (orange), proteomic (green), and metabolomic (blue) data in maize makes it possible to incorporate multiple levels of the biological hierarchy of an agronomic trait directly into genomic selection (GS) models. Each of the different levels of the biological hierarchy can be used to calculate the correspondingly colored relationship matrices G, T, P, and M. Model terms and abbreviations: Y, observed vector trait values for n individuals; μ, grand mean; 1, n-dimensional vector of 1’s; u, n-dimensional random vector of polygenic effects; Z, incidence matrix relating u to Y; ε, n-dimensional random vector for error terms; MVN, multivariate normal

References

    1. Alliance G (2010) Genetics 101. Understanding genetics: a district of Colombia guide for patients and health professionals:22–32 https://www.resourcerepository.org/documents/1869/understandinggenetics:..., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK132149/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK132149.pdf
    1. Araus JL, Kefauver SC, Zaman-Allah M, Olsen MS, Cairns JE. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends in Plant Science. 2018;23(5):451–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argueso CT, Assmann SM, Birnbaum KD, Chen S, Dinneny JR, Doherty CJ, Eveland AL, Friesner J, Greenlee VR, Law JA, Marshall-Colón A, Mason GA, O’Lexy R, Peck SC, Schmitz RJ, Song L, Stern D, Varagona MJ, Walley JW, Williams CM. Directions for research and training in plant omics: big questions and big data. Plant Direct. 2019;3(4):e00133. doi: 10.1002/pld3.133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arruda MP, Lipka AE, Brown PJ, Krill AM, Thurber C, Brown-Guedira G, Dong Y, Foresman BJ, Kolb FL. Comparing genomic selection and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Molecular Breeding. 2016;36(7):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11032-016-0508-5. - DOI
    1. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2012;63(10):3523–3543. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers100. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources