Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 7;193(7):e3171.
doi: 10.1002/vetr.3171. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

Audit of animal-related injuries at UK veterinary schools between 2009 and 2018

John S P Tulloch  1 , Kate M Fleming  2 , Gina Pinchbeck  1 , Julie Forster  3 , Walter Lowe  4 , Carri Westgarth  1
Affiliations

Audit of animal-related injuries at UK veterinary schools between 2009 and 2018

John S P Tulloch et al. Vet Rec. .

Abstract

Background: Animal-related injuries pose a significant risk to the veterinary profession. This study aimed to describe the incidence, demographics, context and consequences of animal-related injuries at UK veterinary schools.

Methods: A multicentre audit of accident records (2009-2018) across five UK veterinary schools was performed. Injury rates were stratified by school, demographics and species. The context and cause of the injury were described. Multivariable logistic models explored factors associated with medical treatment, hospital visits and time off work.

Results: An annual rate of 2.60 (95% confidence interval 2.48-2.72) injuries per 100 graduating students was calculated, varying between veterinary schools. Injuries were more frequently recorded in staff than students, and there were significant differences between staff and students in the activities performed preceding injury. Cats and dogs were associated with the highest number of reported injuries. However, injuries associated with cattle and horses were the most severe, with significantly higher hospital attendances and more time off work taken.

Limitations: Data were based on reported injuries and likely underestimate the true injury rate. The population at risk was hard to quantify as population size and exposure were variable.

Conclusion: Further research is recommended to explore the clinical and workplace management, including recording culture, of animal-related injuries among veterinary professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Parkin TDH, Brown J, Macdonald EB. Occupational risks of working with horses: a questionnaire survey of equine veterinary surgeons. Equine Vet Educ. 2018;30:200-5.
    1. Nienhaus A, Skudlik C, Seidler A. Work-related accidents and occupational diseases in veterinarians and their staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78:230-8.
    1. Mills G. BVA warns of risk of injury to farm vets. Vet Rec. 2019;185:97.
    1. Kabuusu RM, Keku EO, Kiyini R, McCann TJ. Prevalence and patterns of self-reported animal-related injury among veterinarians in metropolitan Kampala. J Vet Sci. 2010;11:363-5.
    1. Lucas M, Day L, Shirangi A, Fritschi L. Significant injuries in Australian veterinarians and use of safety precautions. Occup Med. 2009;59:327-33.

LinkOut - more resources