Effect of managed transition on mental health outcomes for young people at the child-adult mental health service boundary: a randomised clinical trial
- PMID: 37310306
- PMCID: PMC10123823
- DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721003901
Effect of managed transition on mental health outcomes for young people at the child-adult mental health service boundary: a randomised clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Poor transition planning contributes to discontinuity of care at the child-adult mental health service boundary (SB), adversely affecting mental health outcomes in young people (YP). The aim of the study was to determine whether managed transition (MT) improves mental health outcomes of YP reaching the child/adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) boundary compared with usual care (UC).
Methods: A two-arm cluster-randomised trial (ISRCTN83240263 and NCT03013595) with clusters allocated 1:2 between MT and UC. Recruitment took place in 40 CAMHS (eight European countries) between October 2015 and December 2016. Eligible participants were CAMHS service users who were receiving treatment or had a diagnosed mental disorder, had an IQ ⩾ 70 and were within 1 year of reaching the SB. MT was a multi-component intervention that included CAMHS training, systematic identification of YP approaching SB, a structured assessment (Transition Readiness and Appropriateness Measure) and sharing of information between CAMHS and adult mental health services. The primary outcome was HoNOSCA (Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents) score 15-months post-entry to the trial.
Results: The mean difference in HoNOSCA scores between the MT and UC arms at 15 months was -1.11 points (95% confidence interval -2.07 to -0.14, p = 0.03). The cost of delivering the intervention was relatively modest (€17-€65 per service user).
Conclusions: MT led to improved mental health of YP after the SB but the magnitude of the effect was small. The intervention can be implemented at low cost and form part of planned and purposeful transitional care.
Keywords: HoNOSCA; Transition; adolescent; cluster randomised controlled trial; mental disorders; mental health services; structured assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
Frank C. Verhulst is a contributing author of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessments, for which he receives remuneration. Paramala Santosh is the director of HealthTacker Ltd.
References
-
- Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-Age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
-
- Achenbach T. M., & Rescorla L. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles: For ages 18–59: Adult self-report and adult behavior checklist. Burlington, VT: ASEBA.
-
- Appleton, R., Connell, C., Fairclough, E., Tuomainen, H., & Singh, S. P. (2019). Outcomes of young people who reach the transition boundary of child and adolescent mental health services: A systematic review. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(11), 1431–1446. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01307-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ballesteros-Urpí, A., Pardo-Hernández, H., Ferrero-Gregori, A., Torralbas-Ortega, J., Puntí-Vidal, J., Tàpies Olivet, P., … Morer, À (2018). Validation of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the health of the nation outcome scale for children and adolescents (HoNOSCA). Psychiatry Research, 261(March), 554–559. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.057 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Birchwood M. J., Street C., Singh S. P., Lamb C., Anderson Y., WarnerGale F., … Upthegrove R. (2018). Impact and process evaluation of Forward Thinking Birmingham, the 0–25 Mental Health Service: Final Report. University of Warwick; University of Birmingham; GIFT (Great Involvement Future Thinking); CLAHRC-WM.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
