Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 1;32(9):1182-1189.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0064.

Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Korean Women

Affiliations

Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Korean Women

Jihye Choi et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. .

Abstract

Background: To develop a breast cancer prediction model for Korean women using published polygenic risk scores (PRS) combined with nongenetic risk factors (NGRF).

Methods: Thirteen PRS models generated from single or multiple combinations of the Asian and European PRSs were evaluated among 20,434 Korean women. The AUC and increase in OR per SD were compared for each PRS. The PRSs with the highest predictive power were combined with NGRFs; then, an integrated prediction model was established using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) tool. The absolute breast cancer risk was stratified for 18,142 women with available follow-up data.

Results: PRS38_ASN+PRS190_EB, a combination of Asian and European PRSs, had the highest AUC (0.621) among PRSs, with an OR per SD increase of 1.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.31-1.61). Compared with the average risk group (35%-65%), women in the top 5% had a 2.5-fold higher risk of breast cancer. Incorporating NGRFs yielded a modest increase in the AUC of women ages >50 years. For PRS38_ASN+PRS190_EB+NGRF, the average absolute risk was 5.06%. The lifetime absolute risk at age 80 years for women in the top 5% was 9.93%, whereas that of women in the lowest 5% was 2.22%. Women at higher risks were more sensitive to NGRF incorporation.

Conclusions: Combined Asian and European PRSs were predictive of breast cancer in Korean women. Our findings support the use of these models for personalized screening and prevention of breast cancer.

Impact: Our study provides insights into genetic susceptibility and NGRFs for predicting breast cancer in Korean women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Study flow chart. Previously reported breast cancer SNPs were validated among Korean women using various published PRSs, and absolute breast cancer risks were evaluated using the PRS with the highest accuracy (left). Prediction models incorporating PRSs and NGRFs were constructed using a different cohort (right). After evaluating the predictive performance of the models, the absolute breast cancer risk was estimated.
Figure 1.
Study flow chart. Previously reported breast cancer SNPs were validated among Korean women using various published PRSs, and absolute breast cancer risks were evaluated using the PRS with the highest accuracy (left). Prediction models incorporating PRSs and NGRFs were constructed using a different cohort (right). After evaluating the predictive performance of the models, the absolute breast cancer risk was estimated.
Figure 2. AUC for various PRS models and NGRFs predicting the breast cancer risk. The AUC was compared among NGRFs, PRSs, and integrated (PRS+NGRF) models for women. A, Age <50 years. B, ≥50 years.
Figure 2.
AUC for various PRS models and NGRFs predicting the breast cancer risk. The AUC was compared among NGRFs, PRSs, and integrated (PRS+NGRF) models for women. A, Age <50 years. B, ≥50 years.
Figure 3. Estimation of the absolute breast cancer risk by seven percentiles. The absolute risk of developing breast cancer is predicted using the integrated model (PRS38_ASN+PRS190_EB+NGRF). The dotted lines represent the average risks. A, Lifetime absolute risk. B, 5-year absolute risk.
Figure 3.
Estimation of the absolute breast cancer risk by seven percentiles. The absolute risk of developing breast cancer is predicted using the integrated model (PRS38_ASN+PRS190_EB+NGRF). The dotted lines represent the average risks. A, Lifetime absolute risk. B, 5-year absolute risk.
Figure 4. Density plot of breast cancer absolute risk at age 80. The absolute risk was stratified by seven PRS percentiles. A, Multiple PRS model. B, Integrated model.
Figure 4.
Density plot of breast cancer absolute risk at age 80. The absolute risk was stratified by seven PRS percentiles. A, Multiple PRS model. B, Integrated model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Ghoncheh M, Mahdavifar N, Darvishi E, Salehiniya H. Epidemiology, incidence and mortality of breast cancer in Asia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:47–52. - PubMed
    1. Hong S, Won YJ, Park YR, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Lee ES. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat 2020;52:335–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JE, Lee SA, Kim TH, Park S, Choy YS, Ju YJ, et al. . Projection of breast cancer burden due to reproductive/lifestyle changes in Korean women (2013–2030) using an age-period-cohort model. Cancer Res Treat 2018;50:1388–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park HL. Breast cancer risk prediction in Korean women: review and perspectives on personalized breast cancer screening. J Breast Cancer 2020;23:331–42. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types