Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):404.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08354-1.

Sero-prevalence of hepatitis viral infections among sanitary workers across worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sero-prevalence of hepatitis viral infections among sanitary workers across worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sina Tolera et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Sanitation or sanitary workers are exposed to hepatitis virus infections because of filthy and dangerous working conditions. The current global systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled sero-prevalence of occupationally associated hepatitis virus infection among them.

Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), and Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and study design (PICOS) were used for flow diagram, and review questions, respectively. Four databases other methods were used published articles from 2000 to 2022. Boolean logic (AND, OR), MeSH, and keywords were used: (Occupation *OR Job *OR Work) AND (Hepatitis A *OR Hepatitis B virus *OR Hepatitis C virus *OR Hepatitis E virus) AND (Solid waste collectors [SWCs] *OR Street sweepers [SS] *OR Sewage workers [STWs] *OR health care facilities cleaners [HCFCs)) AND (Countries). Stata MP/17 software was used for pooled prevalence analysis, meta-regression analysis (Hedges) at a 95% confidence interval (CI:95%).

Results: A total of 182 studies were identified studies, a total of 28 studies were included from twelve countries. Of these, from developed (n = 7) and developing countries (n = 5). From total a of 9049 sanitary workers, 5951(66%), 2280 (25%) and 818 (9%) were STWs, SWCs and SS, respectively. Globally, the pooled sero-prevalence of occupational-related hepatitis viral infections among sanitary workers was 38.06% (95% CI: 30-0.46.12). Of this, it was 42.96% (95% CI: 32.63-53.29) and 29.81% (95% CI: 17.59-42.02) for high-income and low-income countries, respectively. Meanwhile, by sub-analysis, the highest pooled sero-prevalence of hepatitis viral infections by categories, type and year were 47.66% (95%CI: 37.42-57.90), 48.45% (95% CI: 37.95-58.96), and 48.30% (95% CI: 36.13-60.47) for SWTs, HAV, and 2000 to 2010 year, respectively.

Conclusion: The consistency of the evidence suggests that sanitation workers, particularly sewage workers, are susceptible to occupationally acquired hepatitis regardless of their working conditions, necessitating significant changes to occupational health and safety regulations from governmental policies and other initiatives to reduce risks among sanitary workers.

Keywords: Hepatitis Virus; Infections; Occupation; Sanitary workers; Worldwide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening Process. Flow diagram for systematic review and Meta-Analysis is adapted from PRISMA 2020 Protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Analysis by Globe and Regions. Sero-prevalence of occupational-related hepatitis among sanitary workers by regions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Analysis by Occupations (Categories). Sero-prevalence of hepatitis by occupations within subgroup of sanitary workers
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Analysis by Hepatitis viral Type. Sero-prevalence of hepatitis (HAV, HBV, HCV & HEV) among sanitary workers in worldwide
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Analysis Year-by-Year. Sero-prevalence of hepatitis by Years among sanitary workers across world
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Sensitivity Analysis. After removing three smallest outcomes (a). After removing three largest outcomes(b). Sensitivity analysis after removing two smallest outcomes(a) and three largest outcomes(b)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Publication Bias for eligible found from high-income and low-income countries

Similar articles

References

    1. Kabir, A., N. Farhana, F. Akter, S. Jesmin, A. Ali. Sweeping practices, knowledge about OSH hazards in Dhaka city, Bangladesh:. Aa qualitative inquiry, 2015. 2(3): 237–243. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20150476:
    1. WHO. /World Health Organization/ New report exposes horror of working conditions for millions of sanitation workers in the developing world. 2019.
    1. Gomathi P, Kamala K. Threatening health impacts and challenging life of sanitary workers. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(41):3061.
    1. WHO/World Health Organization/. Health, Safety and Dignity of Sanitation Workers: an Initial Assessment. Guidelines on sanitation and health, Geneva, 2018. 2020, World Health Organization: Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---sector/docume.... Accessed 3 May 2022
    1. Dement JM, Epling C, Ostbye T, Pompeii LA, Hunt DL. Blood and body fluid exposure risks among health care workers: results from the Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System. Am J Ind Med. 2004;46:637–648. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20106. - DOI - PubMed