Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jun 9:11:e15260.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.15260. eCollection 2023.

Follow-up focused on psychological intervention initiated after intensive care unit in adult patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Follow-up focused on psychological intervention initiated after intensive care unit in adult patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shodai Yoshihiro et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Psychological dysfunction is one of the considerable health-related outcomes among critically-ill patients and their informal caregivers. Follow-up of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors has been conducted in a variety of different ways, with different timing after discharge, targets of interest (physical, psychological, social) and measures used. Of diverse ICU follow-up, the effects of follow-ups which focused on psychological interventions are unknown. Our research question was whether follow-up with patients and their informal caregivers after ICU discharge improved mental health compared to usual care. We published a protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis in https://www.protocols.io/ (https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvjwn4pe). We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo from their inception to May 2022. We included randomized controlled trials for follow-ups after ICU discharge and focused on psychological intervention for critically ill adult patients and their informal caregivers. We synthesized primary outcomes, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and adverse events using the random-effects method. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. From the 10,471 records, we identified 13 studies (n = 3, 366) focusing on patients and four (n = 538) focusing on informal caregivers. ICU follow-up for patients resulted in little to no difference in the prevalence of depression (RR 0.89, 95% CI [0.59-1.34]; low-certainty evidence) and PTSD (RR 0.84, 95% CI [0.55-1.30]; low-certainty evidence) among patients; however, it increased the prevalence of depression (RR 1.58 95% CI [1.01-2.46]; very low-certainty evidence), PTSD (RR 1.36, 95% CI [0.91-2.03]; very low-certainty evidence) among informal caregivers. The evidence for the effect of ICU follow-up on adverse events among patients was insufficient. Eligible studies for informal caregivers did not define any adverse event. The effect of follow-ups after ICU discharge that focused on psychological intervention should be uncertain.

Keywords: Critical care; Intensive care units; Mental disorders; Post intensive care syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Shunsuke Taito, Yusuke Tsutsumi, and Yuki Kataoka are affiliated Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, JAPAN, which is an academic research group. Kota Yamauchi is employed by the Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital. Yuki Kataoka is employed by the Kyoto Min-iren Asukai Hospital. Yusuke Tsutsumi is employed by the National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center. The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot and funnel plot of primary outcomes for patients.
(A) Depression, (B) Post-traumatic stress disorder. Adverse events were not pooled.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plot and funnel plot of primary outcomes for informal caregivers.
Post-traumatic stress disorder. Since the outcome of depression was reported in only 1 RCT, we do not show the forest plot and funnel plot. Adverse events were not pooled.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ågren S, Eriksson A, Fredrikson M, Hollman-Frisman G, Orwelius L. The health promoting conversations intervention for families with a critically ill relative: a pilot study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2019;50:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.04.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdelhamid YAli, Phillips LK, White MG, Presneill J, Horowitz M, Deane AM. Survivors of intensive care with type 2 diabetes and the effect of shared-care follow-up clinics: the SWEET-AS Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Chest. 2021;159:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, Carlet J. Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intensive Care Medicine. 2003;29:368–377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1624-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloom SL, Stollings JL, Kirkpatrick O, Wang L, Byrne DW, Sevin CM, Semler MW. Randomized clinical trial of an ICU recovery pilot program for survivors of critical illness. Critical Care Medicine. 2019;47:1337–1345. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003909. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohart S, Egerod I, Bestle MH, Overgaard D, Christensen DF, Jensen JF. Reprint of Recovery programme for ICU survivors has no effect on relatives’ quality of life: secondary analysis of the RAPIT-study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2019;50:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.11.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types