Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 9:11:e15447.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.15447. eCollection 2023.

Reliability and validity of the Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder in Chinese children

Affiliations

Reliability and validity of the Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder in Chinese children

Kai Li et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Background: The Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder (KTK) is a reliable and low-cost motor coordination test tool that has been used in several countries. However, whether the KTK is a reliable and valid instrument for use in Chinese children has not been assessed. Additionally, because the KTK was designed to incorporate locomotor, object control, and stability skills, and there is a lack of measurement tools that include stability skills assessment for Chinese children, the KTK's value and validity are worth discussing.

Methods: A total of 249 primary school children (131 boys; 118 girls) aged 9-10 years from Shanghai were recruited in this study. Against the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3), the concurrent validity of the KTK was assessed. We also tested the retest reliability and internal consistency of the KTK.

Results: The test-retest reliability of the KTK was excellent (overall: r = 0.951; balancing backwards: r = 0.869; hopping for height: r = 0.918; jumping sideways: r = 0.877; moving sideways: r = 0.647). Except for the boys, the internal consistency of the KTK was higher than the acceptable level of Cronbach's α > 0.60 (overall: α = 0.618; boys: α = 0.583; girls: α = 0.664). Acceptable concurrent validity was found between the total scores for the KTK and TGMD-3 (overall: r = 0.420, p < 0.001; boys: r = 0.411, p < 0.001; girls: r = 0.437, p < 0.001).

Discussion: The KTK is a reliable instrument for assessing the motor coordination of children in China. As such, the KTK can be used to monitor the level of motor coordination in Chinese children.

Keywords: Children; China; Internal consistency; Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder; Motor competence; Motor coordination; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The test protocol of the KTK.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient and Scatter plot between the KTK and the TGMD-3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;18(3):91–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardid F, Rudd J, Lenoir M, Polman R, Barnett L. Cross-cultural comparison of motor competence in children from Australia and Belgium. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00964. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardid F, Vannozzi G, Logan SW, Hardy LL, Barnett LM. A hitchhiker’s guide to assessing young people’s motor competence: deciding what method to use. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2019;22(3):311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.08.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnett LM, Webster EK, Hulteen RM, De Meester A, Valentini NC, Lenoir M, Pesce C, Getchell N, Lopes VP, Robinson LE, Brian A, Rodrigues LP. Through the looking glass: a systematic review of longitudinal evidence, providing new insight for motor competence and health. Sports Medicine. 2022;52(4):875–920. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01516-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhui K, Mohamud M, Warfa N, Craig T, Stansfeld S. Cultural adaptation of mental health measures: improving the quality of clinical practice and research. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science. 2003;183(3):184–186. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.3.184. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types