Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 10;7(1):e120.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.540. eCollection 2023.

Design and implementation of a digital site-less clinical study of serial rapid antigen testing to identify asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

Affiliations

Design and implementation of a digital site-less clinical study of serial rapid antigen testing to identify asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

Apurv Soni et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Rapid antigen detection tests (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 with emergency use authorization generally include a condition of authorization to evaluate the test's performance in asymptomatic individuals when used serially. We aim to describe a novel study design that was used to generate regulatory-quality data to evaluate the serial use of Ag-RDT in detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus among asymptomatic individuals.

Methods: This prospective cohort study used a siteless, digital approach to assess longitudinal performance of Ag-RDT. Individuals over 2 years old from across the USA with no reported COVID-19 symptoms in the 14 days prior to study enrollment were eligible to enroll in this study. Participants throughout the mainland USA were enrolled through a digital platform between October 18, 2021 and February 15, 2022. Participants were asked to test using Ag-RDT and molecular comparators every 48 hours for 15 days. Enrollment demographics, geographic distribution, and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates are reported.

Key results: A total of 7361 participants enrolled in the study, and 492 participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 154 who were asymptomatic and tested negative to start the study. This exceeded the initial enrollment goals of 60 positive participants. We enrolled participants from 44 US states, and geographic distribution of participants shifted in accordance with the changing COVID-19 prevalence nationwide.

Conclusions: The digital site-less approach employed in the "Test Us At Home" study enabled rapid, efficient, and rigorous evaluation of rapid diagnostics for COVID-19 and can be adapted across research disciplines to optimize study enrollment and accessibility.

Keywords: Covid-19; digital trial; point-of-care diagnostics; rapid antigen tests; study recruitment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

VK is principal, and TS, SS, CN, ES, and EH are employees of the health care technology company CareEvolution, which was contracted to configure the smartphone study app, provide operational and logistical support, and collaborate on overall research approach. LS and LR are employees of Quest Diagnostics LLC, which was contracted to provide direct-to-consumer kits, logistical support for nationwide RT-PCR testing, and operational support for producing molecular testing results. DDM reports consulting and research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, consulting and research support from Fitbit, consulting, and research support from Flexcon, research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting from Avania, non-financial research support from Apple Computer, consulting/other support from Heart Rhythm Society. YCM has received tests from Quanterix, Becton-Dickinson, Ceres, and Hologic for research-related purposes, consults for Abbott on subjects unrelated to SARS-CoV-2, and receives funding support to Johns Hopkins University from miDiagnostics. LG is on a scientific advisory board for Moderna on projects unrelated to SARS-CoV-2. AS receives non-financial support from CareEvolution for collaborative research activities. Additional authors declare no financial or nonfinancial competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Weekly test us at home study enrollment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
CONSORT diagram of test us at home.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Test us at home enrollment by state and month, October 2021–January 2022.

Update of

References

    1. Policy for Coronavirus Disease-2019 Tests During the Public Health Emergency (Revised) | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents.... Accessed July 4, 2022.
    1. Smith RL, Gibson LL, Martinez PP, et al. Longitudinal assessment of diagnostic test performance over the course of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Infect Dis. 2021;224(6):976–982. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanji JN, Zelyas N, MacDonald C, et al. False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis. Virol J. 2021;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01489-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wei Z, Ryhana M, Elizabeth S, Berry GJ. Comparison of four molecular in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;58(8):e00743–e00720. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00743-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lowe CF, Matic N, Ritchie G, et al. Detection of low levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from nasopharyngeal swabs using three commercial molecular assays. J Clin Virol. 2020;128:104387. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104387. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources