Postoperative recovery scores and pain management: a comparison of modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and quadratus lumborum block for lumbar disc herniation
- PMID: 37314577
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07812-3
Postoperative recovery scores and pain management: a comparison of modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and quadratus lumborum block for lumbar disc herniation
Abstract
Purpose: In this prospective, randomized study, we aimed to compare the global recovery scores and postoperative pain management between US-guided mTLIP block versus QLB after lumbar spine surgery.
Methods: 60 patients with ASA score I-II planned for microendoscopic discectomy under general anesthesia were included. We allocated the patients into two groups: the QLB group (n = 30) or the mTLIP group (n = 30). QLB and mTLIP was performed with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the groups. Paracetamol 1 g IV 3 × 1 was ordered to the patients at the postoperative period. If the NRS score was ≥ 4, 1 mg/kg tramadol IV was administered as rescue analgesia.
Results: There was a significant between-group difference in the mean global QoR-40 scores 24 h postsurgery. Both the static and dynamic NRS scores were significantly lower in the postoperative 1-16 h period in the mTLIP group. There was no significant between-group difference in the NRS scores 24 h postsurgery. There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative rescue analgesia consumption. However, the need for rescue analgesia was lower in the postoperative first 5 h in the mTLIP group, and survival probability was higher in the mTLIP group according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of adverse events.
Conclusion: mTLIP provided superior analgesia compared to posterior QLB. The QoR-40 scores in the mTLIP group were higher than those in the QLB group.
Keywords: Microendoscopic discectomy; Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block; Pain management; Quadratus lumborum block.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Kanno H, Aizawa T, Hahimoto K, Itoi E (2019) Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes. Int Orthop 43(4):917–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4256-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li X, Han Y, Di Z, Cui J, Pan J, Yang M, Sun G, Tan J, Li L (2016) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Neurosci 33:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Momin AA, Steinmetz MP (2020) Evolution of minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. World Neurosurg 140:622–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.071 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J (2015) Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth 62(11):1196–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Doymus O, Selvitopi K, Ahiskalioglu EO, Calikoglu C, Alici HA, Karaca O (2018) Efficacy of ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia after spinal surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 65(5):603–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1051-0 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
