Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF
- PMID: 37314580
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07806-1
Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF
Abstract
Purpose: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Mis-LLIF) can establish indirect decompression by lifting the vertebra with a large intervertebral cage, which causes less damage to the posterior elements. Thus, Mis-LLIF is expected to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD). The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of ASD between Mis-LLIF and conventional open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF).
Methods: A total of 156 patients (TLIF group = 88, Mis-LLIF group = 68) who underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion (L2/3, L3/4, or L4/5) at a single institution between 2003 and 2018 with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of symptomatic ASD requiring reoperation (S-ASD) and radiological adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASD) 2 years postoperatively were investigated between 51 paired patients from both groups who were propensity score (PS) matched by demographic and baseline clinical data. The effect of characteristics arising from differences in surgical methods between Mis-LLIF and TLIF, such as the amount of distraction of the index fused level (∆H), on S-ASD and R-ASD was also examined.
Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of S-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.41-3.9). There was no significant difference in the incidence of R-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups both at the cranial (adjusted OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.22-4.5) and caudal level (adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.44-5.3). On the other hand, ∆H was significantly higher in the Mis-LLIF group than in the TLIF group (3.6 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively, P < 0.0001), and was extracted as a significant independent risk factor for S-ASD (adjusted HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.3) and R-ASD at the cranial side (adjusted HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.7-24) in multivariable analysis with PS adjustment.
Conclusions: The incidence of R-ASD or S-ASD was not significantly reduced in the Mis-LLIF group compared to the TLIF group, with greater ∆H potentially being a contributing factor. Using a thin cage in both TLIF and Mis-LLIF may decrease the occurrence of ASD.
Keywords: Adjacent segment disease; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Reoperation; Revision surgery; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS, and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Mar 8;40(6):733-740. doi: 10.3171/2023.12.SPINE231251. Print 2024 Jun 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024. PMID: 38457789
-
Adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: incidence and risk factors.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 14;23(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05905-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 36376871 Free PMC article.
-
[Effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive and open freehand transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and the influence on adjacent segment degeneration].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 15;38(11):1379-1385. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404059. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 39542631 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15278. Neurosurg Focus. 2015. PMID: 26424344
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34537023 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Commentary on "Simultaneous Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Spondylolisthesis".Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):835-836. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346934.467. Epub 2023 Sep 30. Neurospine. 2023. PMID: 37798978 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
"Risk factors for early-onset adjacent segment disease at L5-S1 segment after isolated L4-5 lumbar fusion surgery".Eur Spine J. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08889-8. Online ahead of print. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40387861
-
Regenerative therapies for lumbar degenerative disc diseases: a literature review.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 26;12:1417600. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1417600. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39257444 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N, Smith M, White GJ, Osburg B (2011) Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 11:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.026 - DOI
-
- Otsuki B, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Kimura H, Shimizu T, Matsuda S (2015) Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a risk factor for further surgery in short-segment lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:2514–2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3603-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Makino T, Fuji T, Yonenobu K (2010) Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. J Neurosurg Spine 12:671–679. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.12.SPINE08823 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rodriguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Munoz-Marin J, Herrera A, Velilla J (2013) Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to 4-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 22:2857–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2853-y - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources