Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0281178.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281178. eCollection 2023.

Impact of statin withdrawal on perceived and objective muscle function

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of statin withdrawal on perceived and objective muscle function

Paul Peyrel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are frequently reported. Nevertheless, few data on objective measures of muscle function are available. Recent data suggesting an important nocebo effect with statin use could confound such effects. The objective was to assess if subjective and objective measures of muscle function improve after drug withdrawal in SAMS reporters.

Methods: Patients (59 men, 33 women, 50.3±9.6 yrs.) in primary cardiovascular prevention composed three cohorts: statin users with (SAMS, n = 61) or without symptoms (No SAMS, n = 15), and controls (n = 16) (registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01493648). Force (F), endurance (E) and power (P) of the leg extensors (ext) and flexors (fle) and handgrip strength (Fhg) were measured using isokinetic and handheld dynamometers, respectively. A 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to self-assess SAMS intensity. Measures were taken before and after two months of withdrawal.

Results: Following withdrawal, repeated-measures analyses show improvements for the entire cohort in Eext, Efle, Ffle, Pext and Pfle (range +7.2 to +13.3%, all p≤0.02). Post-hoc analyses show these changes to occur notably in SAMS (+8.8 to +16.6%), concurrent with a decrease in subjective perception of effects in SAMS (VAS, from 5.09 to 1.85). Fhg was also improved in SAMS (+4.0 to +6.2%) when compared to No SAMS (-1.7 to -4.2%) (all p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Whether suffering from "true" SAMS or nocebo, those who reported SAMS had modest but relevant improvements in muscle function concurrent with a decrease in subjective symptoms intensity after drug withdrawal. Greater attention by clinicians to muscle function in frail statin users appears warranted.

Trial registration: This study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01493648).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. CONSORT diagram of patients’ recruitment.
* All participants recruited into the pilot study had SAMS and were allocated to the SAMS group; ** The large range here is explained by the fact that the participants in the pilot study did not complete all the measures of the study. Exceptions are presented in the methods section; M: men; SAMS: statin-associated muscle symptoms; W: women.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Pre- and post-statin withdrawal measures of physical performance.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error; Post value with * is statistically different from pre value with p≤0.01; Post value with † is statistically different from pre value with p<0.05; Eext: endurance in extension (panel A); Efle: endurance in flexion (panel B); Fext: force in extension (panel C); Ffle: force in flexion (panel D); Fhgl: hand grip force left (panel H); Fhgr: hand grip force right (panel G); Pext: power in extension (panel E); Pfle: power in flexion (panel F); SAMS: statin-associated muscle symptoms.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Impact of statin withdrawal on perceived SAMS intensity by SAMS-CI category using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error; Post value with * is statistically different from pre value; SAMS: statin-associated muscle symptoms; SAMS-CI: SAMS–clinical index.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Impact of statin withdrawal on physical performance by SAMS-CI category.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error; Post value with * is statistically different from pre value with p≤0.01; Post value with † is statistically different from pre value with p<0.05; Eext: endurance in extension (panel A); Efle: endurance in flexion (panel B); Fext: force in extension (panel C); Ffle: force in flexion (panel D); Fhgl: hand grip force left (panel H); Fhgr: hand grip force right (panel G); Pext: power in extension (panel E); Pfle: power in flexion (panel F); SAMS: statin-associated muscle symptoms; SAMS-CI: SAMS–clinical index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al.. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–e143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blaha MJ, Martin SS. How do statins work?: changing paradigms with implications for statin allocation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25):2392–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1626 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boulanger-Piette A, Bergeron J, Desgreniers J, Côté-Levesque M, Brassard D, Joanisse DR, et al.. [Statin intolerance and associated muscular dysfunctions]. Med Sci (Paris). 2015;31(12):1109–14. - PubMed
    1. Thompson PD, Panza G, Zaleski A, Taylor B. Statin-Associated Side Effects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(20):2395–410. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruckert E, Hayem G, Dejager S, Yau C, Begaud B. Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients—the PRIMO study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2005;19(6):403–14. doi: 10.1007/s10557-005-5686-z - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data