Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0286825.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286825. eCollection 2023.

Improved multivariate modeling for soil organic matter content estimation using hyperspectral indexes and characteristic bands

Affiliations

Improved multivariate modeling for soil organic matter content estimation using hyperspectral indexes and characteristic bands

Ming-Song Zhao et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) is a key index of soil fertility. Calculating spectral index and screening characteristic band reduce redundancy information of hyperspectral data, and improve the accuracy of SOM prediction. This study aimed to compare the improvement of model accuracy by spectral index and characteristic band. This study collected 178 samples of topsoil (0-20 cm) in the central plain of Jiangsu, East China. Firstly, visible and near-infrared (VNIR, 350-2500 nm) reflectance spectra were measured using ASD FieldSpec 4 Std-Res spectral radiometer in the laboratory, and inverse-log reflectance (LR), continuum removal (CR), first-order derivative reflectance (FDR) were applied to transform the original reflectance (R). Secondly, optimal spectral indexes (including deviation of arch, difference index, ratio index, and normalized difference index) were calculated from each type of VNIR spectra. Characteristic bands were selected from each type of spectra by the competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) algorithm, respectively. Thirdly, SOM prediction models were established based on random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), deep neural networks (DNN) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) methods using optimal spectral indexes, denoted here as SI-based models. Meanwhile, SOM prediction models were established using characteristic wavelengths, denoted here as CARS-based models. Finally, this research compared and assessed accuracy of SI-based models and CARS-based models, and selected optimal model. Results showed: (1) The correlation between optimal spectral indexes and SOM was enhanced, with absolute value of correlation coefficient between 0.66 and 0.83. The SI-based models predicted SOM content accurately, with the coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values ranging from 0.80 to 0.87, 2.40 g/kg to 2.88 g/kg in validation sets, and relative percent deviation (RPD) value between 2.14 and 2.52. (2) The accuracy of CARS-based models differed with models and spectral transformations. For all spectral transformations, PLSR and SVR combined with CARS displayed the best prediction (R2 and RMSE values ranged from 0.87 to 0.92, 1.91 g/kg to 2.56 g/kg in validation sets, and RPD value ranged from 2.41 to 3.23). For FDR and CR spectra, DNN and RF models achieved more accuracy (R2 and RMSE values ranged from 0.69 to 0.91, 1.90 g/kg to 3.57 g/kg in validation sets, and RPD value ranged from 1.73 to 3.25) than LR and R spectra (R2 and RMSE values from 0.20 to 0.35, 5.08 g/kg to 6.44 g/kg in validation sets, and RPD value ranged from 0.96 to 1.21). (3) Overall, the accuracy of SI-based models was slightly lower than that of CARS-based models. But spectral index had a good adaptability to the models, and each SI-based model displayed the similar accuracy. For different spectra, the accuracy of CARS-based model differed from modeling methods. (4) The optimal CARS-based model was model CARS-CR-SVR (R2 and RMSE: 0.92 and 1.91 g/kg in validation set, RPD: 3.23). The optimal SI-based model was model SI3-SVR (R2 and RMSE: 0.87 and 2.40 g/kg in validation set, RPD: 2.57) and model SI-SVR (R2 and RMSE: 0.84 and 2.63 g/kg in validation set, RPD: 2.35).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Location of study area and sampling sizes.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The flowchart of this research.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Soil mean spectral curves and continuum removal of different SOM content.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correlation coefficient distribution between soil spectral data and SOM content.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Relationship between SOM and deviation of arch related wavelengths.
Fig 6
Fig 6. A contour map of the correlations between SOM content and spectral index (n = 178).
Fig 7
Fig 7. Key variables selected by CARS of raw spectra.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Plot of screened bands based on CARS for different spectral transformations.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Scatter plots of measured and predicted SOM (n = 45).
Fig 10
Fig 10. Scatter plots of measured and predicted SOM of CARS-based models (n = 45).

Similar articles

References

    1. Rossel RAV, Walvoort DJJ, McBratney AB, Janik LJ, Skjemstad JO. Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma. 2006; 131: 59–75.
    1. Sommer S, Hill J, Mégier J. The potential of remote sensing for monitoring rural land use changes and their effects on soil conditions. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 1998; 67: 197–209.
    1. Shi Z, Ji W, Rossel RAV, Chen S, Zhou Y. Prediction of soil organic matter using a spatially constrained local partial least squares regression and the Chinese vis–NIR spectral library. Eur J Soil Sci. 2015; 66: 679–687.
    1. Bartholomeus HM, Schaepman ME, Kooistra L, Stevens A, Hoogmoed WB, Spaargaren OSP. Spectral reflectance based indices for soil organic carbon quantification. Geoderma. 2008; 145: 28–36.
    1. Ostovari Y, Ghorbani-Dashtaki S, Bahrami H-A, Abbasi M, Dematte JAM, Arthur E, et al.. Towards prediction of soil erodibility, SOM and CaCO3 using laboratory Vis-NIR spectra: A case study in a semi-arid region of Iran. Geoderma. 2018; 314: 102–112.

Publication types