Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):636.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09632-z.

Implementing a cirrhosis order set in a tertiary healthcare system: a theory-informed formative evaluation

A M Hyde  1 , E Johnson  1 , T Luig  2 , D Schroeder  2 , M Carbonneau  3 , D Campbell-Scherer #  4   5   6 , P Tandon #  7
Affiliations

Implementing a cirrhosis order set in a tertiary healthcare system: a theory-informed formative evaluation

A M Hyde et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Standardized order sets are a means of increasing adherence to clinical practice guidelines and improving the quality of patient care. Implementation of novel quality improvement initiatives like order sets can be challenging. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a formative evaluation to understand healthcare providers' perspectives on implementing clinical changes and the individual, collective and organizational contextual factors that might impact implementation at eight hospital sites in Alberta, Canada.

Methods: We utilized concepts from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to understand the context, past implementation experiences, and perceptions of the cirrhosis order set. Eight focus groups were held with healthcare professionals caring for patients with cirrhosis. Data were coded deductively using relevant constructs of NPT and CFIR. A total of 54 healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, social workers and pharmacists and a physiotherapist, participated in the focus groups.

Results: Key findings revealed that participants recognized the value of the cirrhosis order set and its potential to improve the quality of care. Participants highlighted potential implementation challenges, including multiple competing quality improvement initiatives, feelings of burnout, lack of communication between healthcare provider groups, and a lack of dedicated resources to support implementation.

Conclusions: Implementing a complex improvement initiative across clinician groups and acute care sites presents challenges. This work yielded insights into the significant influence of past implementation of similar interventions and highlighted the importance of communication between clinician groups and resources to support implementation. However, by using multiple theoretical lenses to illuminate what and how contextual and social processes will influence uptake, we can better anticipate challenges during the implementation process.

Keywords: Cirrhosis; Formative evaluation; Implementation; Implementation theory; Order set.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Wells C, Loshak H. CADTH rapid response reports. In: Standardized hospital order sets in acute care: a review of clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, and guidelines. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Copyright © 2019 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019. - PubMed
    1. Meleskie J, Eby D. Adaptation and implementation of standardized order sets in a network of multi-hospital corporations in rural Ontario. Healthc Q. 2009;12(1):78–83. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20418. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim WR, Brown RS, Jr, Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002;36(1):227–242. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34734. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM, Burdick E, Hickey M, Kleefield S, Shea B, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1311–1316. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1311. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–1238. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223. - DOI - PubMed