Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):630.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09618-x.

Assessing the sustainability and scalability of a diabetes eHealth innovation: a mixed-methods study

Arani Sivakumar  1 , Rachel Y Pan  1 , Angel Wang  1 , Dorothy Choi  1 , Ali Ben Charif  2 , Monika Kastner  3   4 , France Légaré  5 , Catherine H Yu  6   7   8   9
Affiliations

Assessing the sustainability and scalability of a diabetes eHealth innovation: a mixed-methods study

Arani Sivakumar et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: To date, little is known about the sustainability and scalability of MyDiabetesPlan, an eHealth innovation designed to facilitate shared decision-making within diabetes care. To avoid the possibility of its short-lived implementation and promote wider adoption so as to promote patient-centred diabetes care, it is critical to understand MyDiabetesPlan's sustainability and scalability in order to ensure its long-term impact at a greater scale. We sought to identify the sustainability and scalability potential of MyDiabetesPlan and its limiting factors.

Methods: Using a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 20 individuals involved in the development and implementation of MyDiabetesPlan. The National Health Services Sustainability Model (NHSSM) and the Innovation Scalability Self-administered Questionnaire (ISSaQ) were administered using a 'think-aloud' approach and subsequently, short semi-structured interviews were conducted. Mean aggregate scores and stakeholder-specific scores were generated for the NHSSM and ISSaQ, to quantitatively determine facilitating and limiting factors to sustainability and scalability. Content analysis occurred iteratively with qualitative data, to examine commonalities and differences with the quantitative findings.

Results: The top facilitating factor to sustaining MyDiabetesPlan was "Staff involvement and training to sustain the process.", whereas the top limiting factors were: "Adaptability of Improved Process", "Senior Leadership Engagement" and "Infrastructure for Sustainability". The top three facilitating factors for scale-up were "Acceptability", "Development with Theory" and "Consistency with Policy Directives." Conversely, the top three limiting factors were "Financial and Human Resources", "Achievable Adoption" and "Broad Reach". Qualitative findings corroborated the limiting/facilitating factors identified.

Conclusions: Addressing staff involvement throughout the dynamic care contexts, and resource constraints impacting scale-up can enhance the sustainability and scalability of MyDiabetesPlan. As such, future plans will focus on garnering organizational leadership buy-in and support, which may address the resource constraints associated with sustainability and scalability and improve the capacity for adequate staff involvement. eHealth researchers will be able to prioritize these limiting factors from the outset of their tool development to purposefully optimize its sustainability and scalability performance.

Keywords: Diabetes; Implementation; MyDiabetesPlan; Primary care; Scalability; Scale-up; Sustainability; eHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Aggregate score differences between mean stakeholder scores (n = 20) and maximum scores for the NHSSM for individual sustainability items
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of aggregate stakeholder agreement ratings with ISSaQ statements
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tiffin N, George A, LeFevre AE. How to use relevant data for maximal benefit with minimal risk: digital health data governance to protect vulnerable populations in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):e001395. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001395. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatia A, Matthan R, Khanna T, Balsari S. Regulatory Sandboxes: a cure for mHealth Pilotitis? J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e21276. doi: 10.2196/21276. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savaya R, Spiro S, Elran-Barak R. Sustainability of social programs: a comparative case study analysis. Am J Eval. 2008;29(4):478–493. doi: 10.1177/1098214008325126. - DOI
    1. Moore JE, Mascarenhas A, Bain J, Straus SE. Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0637-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milat AJ, King L, Bauman AE, Redman S. The concept of scalability: increasing the scale and potential adoption of health promotion interventions into policy and practice. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(3):285–298. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar097. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources