Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 24;11(5):1107.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051107.

Preliminary Study on Artificial versus Animal-Based Feeding Systems for Amblyomma Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)

Affiliations

Preliminary Study on Artificial versus Animal-Based Feeding Systems for Amblyomma Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)

Patrick Stephan Sebastian et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Hard ticks pose a threat to animal and human health. Active life stages need to feed on a vertebrate host in order to complete their life cycle. To study processes such as tick-pathogen interactions or drug efficacy and pharmacokinetics, it is necessary to maintain tick colonies under defined laboratory conditions, typically using laboratory animals. The aim of this study was to test a membrane-based artificial feeding system (AFS) applicable for Amblyomma ticks using Amblyomma tonelliae as a biological model. Adult ticks from a laboratory colony were fed in a membrane-based AFS. For comparison, other A. tonelliae adults were fed on calf and rabbit. The proportions of attached (AFS: 76%; calf/rabbit: 100%) and engorged females (AFS: 47.4%; calf/rabbit: 100%) in the AFS were significantly lower compared to animal-based feeding (p = 0.0265). The engorgement weight of in vitro fed ticks (x¯ = 658 mg; SD ± 259.80) did not significantly differ from that of ticks fed on animals (p = 0.3272, respectively 0.0947). The proportion of females that oviposited was 100% for all three feeding methods. However, the incubation period of eggs (x¯ = 54 days; SD ± 7) was longer in the AFS compared to conventional animal-based feeding (p = 0.0014); x¯ = 45 days; SD ± 2 in the rabbit and (p = 0.0144). x¯ = 48 days; SD ± 2 in the calf). Egg cluster hatching (x¯ = 41%; SD ± 44.82) was lower in the AFS than in the other feeding methods (rabbit: x¯ = 74%; SD ± 20; p = 0.0529; calf: x¯ = 81%; SD ± 22; p = 0.0256). Although the attachment, development, and the hatching of AFS ticks were below those from animal-based feeding, the method may be useful in future experiments. Nevertheless, further experiments with a higher number of tick specimens (including immature life stages) and different attractant stimuli are required to confirm the preliminary results of this study and to evaluate the applicability of AFS for Amblyomma ticks as an alternative to animal-based feeding methods.

Keywords: 3R principle; Argentina; South America; feeding systems; hard ticks; laboratory animals; membrane-based feeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical illustration of the results of the three different feeding systems of female Amblyomma tonelliae ticks. (A) Feeding duration (TOF, time from attachment to detachment); (B) weight of the engorged females; (C) pre-oviposition period (POP, time from female detachment until beginning of oviposition); (D) incubation period of eggs (IP, time from the laying of the first egg until first egg hatched); (E) larvae hatching rate (PEH, proportion of egg clusters hatching; number of hatched larvae/(number of hatched larvae + number of unhatched eggs). [d] = days; [mg] = weight in milligram; [%] = percentage of egg clusters hatching; The line in the middle of each boxplots represents the median; “x” within the boxplot represents the mean value. Dashes represent the minimum and the maximum value of each boxplot; dots represent outliers of each boxplot.

References

    1. Sonenshine D.E., Lane R.S., Nicholson W.L. Ticks (Ixodida) In: Mullen G.R., Durden L.A., editors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 2002. pp. 517–558.
    1. Levin M.L., Schumacher L.B. Manual for maintenance of multi-host ixodid ticks in the laboratory. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016;70:343–367. doi: 10.1007/s10493-016-0084-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. González J., Bickerton M., Toledo A. Applications of artificial membrane feeding for ixodid ticks. Acta Trop. 2021;215:105818. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105818. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rutledge L.C., Ward R.A., Gould D.J. Studies on the Feeding Response of Mosquitos to Nutritive Solutions in a New Membrane Feeder. Mosq. News. 1964;24:407–419.
    1. Hokama Y., Lane R.S., Howarth J.A. Maintenance of Adult and Nymphal Ornithodoros coriaceus (Acari: Argasidae) by Artificial Feeding Through a Parafilm Membrane. J. Med. Entomol. 1987;24:319–322. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/24.3.319. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources