The international transportation of frozen embryos does not affect IVF outcomes
- PMID: 37318611
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07092-8
The international transportation of frozen embryos does not affect IVF outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: The regulated transportation of cryopreserved human embryos resulting from assisted reproduction treatments offers opportunities for patients undergoing embryo transfer in other regions/countries. However, the principal concern for fertility clinics is maintaining unaltered embryo quality to ensure satisfactory clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the transportation process comparing the survival rate and competence of transported embryos to embryos produced and transferred on-site, in frozen embryo transfer cycles.
Methods: This retrospective study assessed the outcomes of 621 blastocysts thawed at IVI Roma (Italy) between March 2021 and March 2022. Autologous or donated oocytes fertilized in vitro, cultured to the blastocyst stage, and cryopreserved in IVI Roma clinic (Group A, n = 450), were compared to embryos generated in IVI Spain clinics and transported to IVI Roma (Group B, n = 171).
Results: Groups A and B respectively showed no significant difference in embryo survival rates after thawing (N = 440/450, 97.8% vs. N = 168/171, 98.2%, p = 0.71), pregnancy rates (N = 221/440, 50.23% vs. N = 77/168, 45.83%, p = 0.33), clinical pregnancy rates (N = 200/440, 45.45% vs. N = 62/168, 36.90%, p = 0.06), and miscarriage rates (N = 42/221, 19,00% vs. 21/77, 28.57%, p = 0.13), even after stratification for the source of the oocyte. Logistic binomial regression considering donor oocytes, preimplantation genetic testing, and patients' age, did not show any significant results on embryo survival and IVF outcomes.
Conclusion: The regulated transport of cryopreserved blastocysts did not affect embryo survival rate or IVF outcomes. Our data support the safety of embryo cryopreservation and medical transportation services, allowing clinics and patients to transport embryos with no significant risk to embryo competence.
Keywords: ART; Embryo cryopreservation; Embryo transport; Embryo vitrification; FET.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Cohen J, Grudzinskas G, Johnson M (2012) Welcome to the ’100% Club’! Reprod Biomed Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.03.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Coates A et al (2017) Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen Z-J et al (2016) Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1513873 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Wang A et al (2017) Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates. Fertil Steril. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Mohamed AMF, Chouliaras S, Jones CJP, Nardo LG (2011) Live birth rate in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles in women with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.01.020 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources