Are we ready to ring in a new upfront therapy in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?
- PMID: 37321236
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01130-3
Are we ready to ring in a new upfront therapy in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?
Conflict of interest statement
I have received consultancies, honoraria, and speakers bureaus fees from AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Daiichi, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Novartis, and Stemline, all unrelated to luspatercept. I have received consultancies, honoraria, and speakers bureaus fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb to present results of the PACE-MDS and MEDALIST trials that assessed the use of luspatercept as salvage therapy (ie, in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes for whom erythropoiesis-stimulating agents failed); neither study used luspatercept as an upfront therapy in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who were eligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. I have received research funding from Celgene for an investigator-initiated study of azacitidine-based therapy and entinostat in the treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukaemia. I have served on data safety monitoring boards for Astex, Takeda, AbbVie, and Syndax, all unrelated to luspatercept.
Comment on
-
Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2023 Jul 29;402(10399):373-385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00874-7. Epub 2023 Jun 10. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 37311468 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
