Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Aug;80(8):469-484.
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108608. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Workplace mental health screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Workplace mental health screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jessica Strudwick et al. Occup Environ Med. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Workplaces are an important location for population mental health interventions. Screening to detect employees at risk of or experiencing mental ill health is increasingly common. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of workplace mental health screening programmes on employee mental health, work outcomes, user satisfaction, positive mental health, quality of life, help-seeking and adverse effects. PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus, Global Health and SciELO were searched (database inception-10 November 2022) and results screened by two independent reviewers. Controlled trials evaluating screening of workers' mental health as related to their employment were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes for each outcome of interest. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the certainty of findings. Of the 12 328 records screened, 11 were included. These reported 8 independent trials collectively assessing 2940 employees. Results indicated screening followed by advice or referral was ineffective in improving employee mental health symptoms (n=3; d=-0.07 (95% CI -0.29 to 0.15)). Screening followed by facilitated access to treatment interventions demonstrated a small improvement in mental health (n=4; d=-0.22 (95% CI -0.42 to -0.02)). Limited effects were observed for other outcomes. Certainty ranged from low to very low. The evidence supporting workplace mental health screening programmes is limited and available data suggest mental health screening alone does not improve worker mental health. Substantial variation in the implementation of screening was observed. Further research disentangling the independent effect of screening alongside the efficacy of other interventions to prevent mental ill health at work is required.

Keywords: Mental Health; Occupational Health; Public Health Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JS, SH, SM, AG, MD, TB and SBH are employed by the Black Dog Institute, a not-for-profit research institute that provides mental health training to a range of organisations.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of the effects of screening followed by advice and screening followed by treatment on employee reported mental health symptoms. CAU, Care as Usual; GHQ-12, 12-Item General Health Questionnaire; QIDS-SR, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report; WLC, Wait List Control.

References

    1. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. . Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet 2020;396:1204–22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harvey SB, Henderson M, Lelliott P, et al. . Mental health and employment: much work still to be done. Br J Psychiatry 2009;194:201–3. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.055111 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blomgren J, Perhoniemi R. Increase in sickness absence due to mental disorders in Finland: trends by gender, age and diagnostic group in 2005–2019. Scand J Public Health 2022;50:318–22. 10.1177/1403494821993705 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cattrell A, Harris EC, Palmer KT, et al. . Regional trends in awards of incapacity benefit by cause. Occup Med (Lond) 2011;61:148–51. 10.1093/occmed/kqr008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knudsen AK, Harvey SB, Mykletun A, et al. . Common mental disorders and long-term sickness absence in a general working population. The Hordaland health study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2013;127:287–97. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01902.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types