Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jun 15;23(1):1161.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16000-3.

Enhancing the effectiveness of infectious disease health education for children and adolescents in China: a national multicenter school-based trial

Xinxin Wang  1   2 , Jieyu Liu  3 , Yu Wu  4 , Binbin Su  4 , Manman Chen  3 , Qi Ma  3 , Tao Ma  3 , Li Chen  3 , Yi Zhang  3 , Yanhui Dong  5 , Yi Song  6 , Jun Ma  3
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Enhancing the effectiveness of infectious disease health education for children and adolescents in China: a national multicenter school-based trial

Xinxin Wang et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Infectious diseases pose a significant risk to the health and well-being of children and adolescents, and can even be life-threatening. Thus, our study aimed to explore the effectiveness of health education based on the social-ecological model in improving the knowledge of infectious diseases among this vulnerable population.

Methods: This study was a school-based intervention conducted in seven Chinese provinces in 2013, involving a total of 26,591 children and adolescents in the intervention group and 24,327 in the control group. The intervention group received a comprehensive health intervention based on the social-ecological model (SEM) over six months, which included a supportive environment, health education on infectious diseases, guidance on self-monitoring infectious disease-related behaviors, and other measures. Data on infectious disease-related knowledge and other characteristics were collected through questionnaires. The main outcome measure will be the difference in the effectiveness of health education regarding infectious diseases in children and adolescents between baseline and post-intervention. A mixed-effects regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to assess the impact of infectious disease-related interventions on the participants.

Results: We utilized a socioecological model as the foundation for a six-month health education program on infectious diseases targeting children and adolescents in the intervention group. At the individual and community levels, the correct rate of health behavior related to infectious diseases in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), the ORs (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.90-0.99) and 0.94 (0.89-0.99), respectively. But the intervention effect was not significant at the interpersonal level. The intervention effect at the organizational level was obvious, with an increase in opportunities for children and adolescents to acquire knowledge of infectious diseases from courses and lectures, teachers, and doctors, (all P < 0.05), with the ORs (95% CI) of 0.92 (0.87-0.97) and 0.86 (0.83-0.94), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in school infectious disease health education policy.

Conclusion: Enhancing health education regarding infectious diseases is crucial in promoting comprehensive prevention and control measures among children and adolescents. Nevertheless, it remains imperative to reinforce health education on infectious diseases at the interpersonal and policy levels. This holds significant reference value for mitigating childhood infectious diseases in the post-COVID-19 era.

Keywords: Children and adolescents; China; Infectious disease; Intervention; Social-ecological model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Infectious disease prevention interventions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trial procedures and interventions received by subjects
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fauci AS, Touchette NA, Folkers GK. Emerging infectious diseases: a 10-year perspective from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(4):519–25. doi: 10.3201/eid1104.041167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McArthur DB. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Nurs Clin N Am. 2019;54(2):297–311. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2019.02.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan M, Adil SF, Alkhathlan HZ, Tahir MN, Saif S, Khan M et al. COVID-19: A global challenge with Old History, Epidemiology and Progress so far. Molecules. 2020;26(1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizk JG, Lippi G, Henry BM, Forthal DN, Rizk Y. Prevention and Treatment of Monkeypox. Drugs. 2022;82(9):957–63. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01742-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Why Infectious Diseases Are Still a Problem. and Surveillance Is Still Required [EB] [(accessed on 9 October 2018)]; Available online: [Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/introduction/en/index1.html

Publication types