Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15;24(1):407.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07394-x.

Bipolar haemostatic forceps versus standard therapy by haemoclip + / - epinephrine injection as initial endoscopic treatment in active non-variceal upper GI bleeding: study protocol for a prospective, randomized multicentre trial (BeBop-Trial)

Daniel Schmitz  1 , Lucas Thielemann  2 , Felix Grassmann  3
Affiliations

Bipolar haemostatic forceps versus standard therapy by haemoclip + / - epinephrine injection as initial endoscopic treatment in active non-variceal upper GI bleeding: study protocol for a prospective, randomized multicentre trial (BeBop-Trial)

Daniel Schmitz et al. Trials. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Patients with active nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) usually require urgent endoscopic treatment. Standard therapy (ST) using haemoclip + / - epinephrine injection is not always successful. Bipolar haemostatic forceps (HemoStat/Pentax®) are an approved medical device for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, their use as a primary endoscopic treatment for active NVUGIB has not yet been proven in a randomized prospective study.

Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, multicentre superiority trial (n ≥ 5). Patients with active NVUGIB will be randomized (1:1) to ST and to experimental therapy (ET) by application of bipolar haemostatic forceps. In the case of failed initial treatment within 15 min, crossover treatment will be attempted first. Rescue treatment (e.g. via over-the-scope-clip) will then be allowed after 30 min. All patients will also receive standard therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Forty-five patients per treatment arm are required to demonstrate an absolute difference of 25.4% with a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05.

Discussion: The hypothesis of the study is that bipolar haemostatic forceps are superior to ST in terms of successful primary haemostasis and the absence of recurrent bleeding within 30 days (combined endpoint). The 1:1 randomization is also ethically justifiable for this study, as both procedures are approved for the intervention in question. To further increase the safety of the patients in the study, crossover treatment and rescue treatment are planned. The prospective design seems feasible in a reasonable time frame (recruitment period of 12 months), as nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is common. Anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet drugs could be an important confounding factor in the statistical analysis that needs to be taken into account and calculated if necessary. In conclusion, this randomized, prospective, multicentre study could make an important contribution to answering the question of whether bipolar haemostatic forceps could be the first-line therapy in the endoscopic treatment of stage Forrest I a + b NVUGIB.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05353062. Registered on April 30 2022.

Keywords: Endoscopic; Gastrointestinal haemorrhage; Haemostasis; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pentax HemoStat-WideCup bipolar haemostatic forceps inserted in the endoscope (left) and shown as a whole catheter (right)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Settings of the HemoStat WideCup bipolar electric haemostatic forceps for different generators
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oakland K. Changing epidemiology and etiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;42–43:101610. 10.1016/j.bpg.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 17. PMID: 31785737. - PubMed
    1. Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E, Dobru D, Kaskas B, Kuvaev R, Pech O, Ragunath K, Weusten B, Familiari P, Domagk D, Valori R, Kaminski MF, Spada C, Bretthauer M, Bennett C, Senore C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rutter MD. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2016;48(9):843–864. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-113128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, Camus M, Lau J, Lanas A, Laursen SB, Radaelli F, Papanikolaou IS, Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Awadie H, Braun G, de Groot N, Udd M, Sanchez-Yague A, Neeman Z, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021;53(3):300–332. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-5274. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arima S, Sakata Y, Ogata S, Tominaga N, Tsuruoka N, Mannen K, Shiraishi R, Shimoda R, Tsunada S, Sakata H, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K. Evaluation of hemostasis with soft coagulation using endoscopic hemostatic forceps in comparison with metallic hemoclips for bleeding gastric ulcers: a prospective, randomized trial. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(5):501–505. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0186-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data