Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 16;12(6):1579-1582.
doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00238.

Synthetic Biology─High Time to Deliver?

Affiliations

Synthetic Biology─High Time to Deliver?

Andrew D Hanson et al. ACS Synth Biol. .

Abstract

Synthetic biology (SynBio) has attracted like no other recent development the attention not only of Life Science researchers and engineers but also of intellectuals, technology think-tanks, and private and public investors. This is largely due to its promise to propel biotechnology beyond its traditional realms in medicine, agriculture, and environment toward new territories historically dominated by the chemical and manufacturing industries─but now claimed to be amenable to complete biologization. For this to happen, it is crucial for the field to remain true to its foundational engineering drive, which relies on mathematics and quantitative tools to construct practical solutions to real-world problems. This article highlights several SynBio themes that, in our view, come with somewhat precarious promises that need to be tackled. First, SynBio must critically examine whether enough basic information is available to enable the design or redesign of life processes and turn biology from a descriptive science into a prescriptive one. Second, unlike circuit boards, cells are built with soft matter and possess inherent abilities to mutate and evolve, even without external cues. Third, the field cannot be presented as the one technical solution to many grave world problems and so must avoid exaggerated claims and hype. Finally, SynBio should pay heed to public sensitivities and involve social science in its development and growth, and thus change the technology narrative from sheer domination of the living world to conversation and win-win partnership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Explosive growth of the SynBio literature.

References

    1. Endy D. Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 2005, 438, 449–553. 10.1038/nature04342. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodgman C. E.; Jewett M. C. Cell-free synthetic biology: thinking outside the cell. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 261–269. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron D. E.; Bashor C. J.; Collins J. J. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 381–390. 10.1038/nrmicro3239. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boehm C. R.; Pollak B.; Purswani N.; Patron N.; Haseloff J. Synthetic botany. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a023887.10.1101/cshperspect.a023887. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceroni F.; Ellis T. The challenges facing synthetic biology in eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018, 19, 481–482. 10.1038/s41580-018-0013-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types