Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 30:17:1168788.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1168788. eCollection 2023.

Social cognitive neuroscience in the digital age

Affiliations
Review

Social cognitive neuroscience in the digital age

Margaret M Doheny et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Human interactions are increasingly taking place from a distance through methods of remote interpersonal communication like video chatting and social media. While remote interpersonal communication has existed for millennia-with the first postal system arising in ∼2400 B.C.-accelerated advances in technology and the recent global COVID-19 pandemic have led to a dramatic increase in remote interpersonal communication use in daily life. Remote interpersonal communication presents a challenge to the field of social-cognitive neuroscience, as researchers seek to understand the implications of various types of remote interpersonal communication for the "social brain." The present paper reviews our current understanding of the social-cognitive neural network and summarizes critical differences between the neural correlates of social cognition in remote vs. face-to-face interactions. In particular, empirical and theoretical work is reviewed that highlight disparities in the neural mechanisms of social perception, evaluation of social stimuli, human motivation, evaluation of social reward, and theory of mind. Potential impacts of remote interpersonal communication on the development of the brain's social-cognitive network are also discussed. Finally, this review closes with future directions for research on social-cognitive neuroscience in our digital technology-connected world and outlines a neural model for social cognition in the context of remote interpersonal communication. For the field of social-cognitive neuroscience to advance alongside of the ever-evolving society, it is crucial for researchers to acknowledge the implications and concepts suggested for future research in this review.

Keywords: cognitive neuroscience; digital media; digital technology; remote communication; social cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A timeline containing prominent developments in remote interpersonal communication in the past millennium. This timeline’s purpose is to exhibit the rapid progression and evolution in technology in recent years, especially following the invention of the World Wide Web (see Supplementary Appendix A for citations).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A visual representation of the keywords used in this review to describe the different types of remote communication.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The current model of “The Social Brain,” adapted by Adolphs (2009). All processes work both independently and in concordance with one another to complete self-regulation, reappraisal, and contextual application.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The proposed neural model for the remote social brain. “Increased activation” is activation that is present during aspects of remote communication more than during face-to-face communication (green). “Similar activation” is activation present at a similar level during remote communication and in-person communication (yellow). “Decreased activation” is activation that is substantially less present or completely absent in remote communication compared with that of face-to-face (red). (A) Left lateral view of the brain; speckles are to indicate mirror neurons, in that they are affected, but the region as a whole is not; (B) sagittal view; (C) axial view; (D) coronal view. Superior colliculus (decreased) and is not pictured for figure clarity.

References

    1. Adolphs R. (2003). Is the human amygdala specialized for processing social information? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 985 326–340. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07091.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R. (2009). The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60 693–716. 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R. (2010). Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience. Neuron 65 752–767. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreassen C. S., Pallesen S., Griffiths M. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey. Addict. Behav. 64 287–293. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews J. L., Khin A. C., Crayn T., Humphreys K., Schweizer S. (2022). Measuring online and offline social rejection sensitivity in the digital age. Psychol. Assess. 34 742–751. 10.1037/pas0001136 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources