Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 27:33:101156.
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101156. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Effect of bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning therapy on lumbar spine function and postoperative complications in patients with severe lumbar spondylolisthesis

Affiliations

Effect of bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning therapy on lumbar spine function and postoperative complications in patients with severe lumbar spondylolisthesis

Jincai Tian et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. .

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively study the efficacy of bone cement-enhanced pedicle screws combined with interbody fusion reduction in the treatment of severe lumbar spondylolisthesis, its effect on lumbar function and complications.

Methods: From January 2019 to June 2021, 82 cases of severe lumbar spondylolisthesis in our hospital were analyzed. According to the different treatment plans, the patients were divided into two groups: A and B, in which group A patients were treated with pedicle screws combined with fusion and reduction, and group B patients were treated with bone cement reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion and reduction. Perioperative indexes, pain severity (VAS), Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), and low back and leg pain score of Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA), spondylolisthesis reduction, intervertebral space height, intervertebral foramen height, complications, and screw loosening were compared between the two groups.

Results: There was no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A, and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of group A. The vertebral fusion rate of group B was higher than that of group A (P < 0.05). The VAS, ODI and JOA scores at the last follow-up in both groups were lower than those before surgery, and group B was lower than group A (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, the postoperative slippage degree grading improved in both groups, while the improvement rate in group B was higher than that in group A (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the scores of intervertebral foramen height and intervertebral space height in both groups were higher than those before operation, and those in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications and screw loosening between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with conventional screw treatment, bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning can further improve the repositioning rate of slipped vertebrae in the treatment of severe LSL, while achieving a better intervertebral fusion rate. Therefore, the treatment of severe LSL with bone cement reinforced pedicle fusion and reduction is a safe and effective method.

Keywords: Cement-reinforced pedicle screw; Complications; Fusion repositioning; Lumbar spine function; Severe lumbar spondylolisthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of perioperative indicators between the two groups (A: Surgrry time; B: Intra-operative bleeding; C: Length of hospitalization; D: Vertebral fusion rate).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of function recovery between the two groups (A: VAS; B: ODI; C: JOA).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of imaging evaluation indexes between the two groups (A: Intervertebral foraminal height; B: Intervertebral space height).

Similar articles

References

    1. Bydon M., Alvi M.A., Goyal A. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: definition, natural history, conservative management, and surgical treatment. Neurosurg. Clin. 2019 Jul;30(3):299–304. - PubMed
    1. Aoki Y., Takahashi H., Nakajima A., Kubota G., Watanabe A., Nakajima T., Eguchi Y., Orita S., Fukuchi H., Yanagawa N., Nakagawa K., Ohtori S. Prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Sci. Rep. 2020 Apr 21;10(1):6739. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghogawala Z., Dunbar M.R., Essa I. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: modern registries and the development of artificial intelligence. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2019 Jun 1;30(6):729–735. - PubMed
    1. Kotani Y., Koike Y., Ikeura A., Tokunaga H., Saito T. Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J. Orthop. Sci. 2021 Nov;26(6):992–998. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Dec 16. PMID: 33339720. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nöst X., Pferschy-Wenzig E.M., Yu X.T., Li M., Tong X.L., Bauer R. Comprehensive metabolic profiling of modified Gegen Qinlian decoction by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-diodearraydetection-Q-Exactive-Orbitrap-electrosprayionization-massspectrometry/mass spectrometry and application of high-performance thin-layer chromatography. World J Tradit Chin Med. 2021;7:11–32.

LinkOut - more resources