Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 7;5(3):325-331.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.02.004. eCollection 2023 May.

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Encounters: Analysis of Factors that Impact the Press Ganey Survey in the Hand Surgery Population

Affiliations

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Encounters: Analysis of Factors that Impact the Press Ganey Survey in the Hand Surgery Population

Miranda J Rogers et al. J Hand Surg Glob Online. .

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to identify patient characteristics and visit components that affect patient satisfaction with virtual new patient visits in an outpatient hand surgery clinic as measured by the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) total score (primary outcome) and provider subscore (secondary outcome).

Methods: Adult patients evaluated through virtual new patient visits at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2020 and October 2020 who completed the PGOMPS for virtual visits were included. Data regarding demographics and visit characteristics were collected via chart review. Factors associated with satisfaction were identified using a Tobit regression model on the continuous score outcomes (Total Score and Provider Subscore) to account for substantial ceiling effects.

Results: A total of 95 patients were included: 54% were men and the mean age was 54 ± 16 years. Mean area deprivation index was 32 ± 18, and the mean driving distance to the clinic was 97 ± 188 mi. Common diagnoses include compressive neuropathy (21%), hand arthritis (19%), hand mass (12%), and fracture/dislocation (11%). Treatment recommendations included small joint injection (20%), in-person evaluation (25%), surgery (36%), and splinting (20%). Multivariable Tobit regressions showed notable differences in satisfaction by the provider on the Total Score but not on the Provider Subscore. Other factors known to affect the PGOMPS scores for in-person visits were not notably associated with the Total or Provider Sub-Scores for virtual visits (area deprivation index, age, and offer of surgery or injection) other than the body mass index.

Conclusions: Virtual clinic visit satisfaction was affected by the provider. Wait time strongly affects satisfaction with in-person visits but is not accounted for by the PGOMPS scoring system for virtual visits, which is a limitation of their survey. Further work is required to determine how to improve the patient experience with virtual visits.

Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.

Keywords: Patient factors; Patient satisfaction; Press Ganey; Virtual visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mao G., Gigliotti M.J., Dupre D. The use of hospital consumer assessment of healthcare services and the Press Ganey medical practice surveys in guiding surgical patient care practices. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham B., Green A., James M., et al. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(1):80–84. - PubMed
    1. Hopkins B.S., Patel M.R., Yamaguchi J.T., et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction and survey participation after spine surgery: a retrospective review of 17,853 consecutive spinal patients from a single academic institution. Part 1: Press Ganey. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(3):382–388. - PubMed
    1. Abtahi A.M., Presson A.P., Zhang C., et al. Association between orthopaedic outpatient satisfaction and non-modifiable patient factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(13):1041–1048. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson D.A., Yarnold P.R., Williams D.R., et al. Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(6):657–665. - PubMed