Comparative analysis of CAR T-cell therapy access for DLBCL patients: associated challenges and solutions in the four largest EU countries
- PMID: 37324138
- PMCID: PMC10263061
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1128295
Comparative analysis of CAR T-cell therapy access for DLBCL patients: associated challenges and solutions in the four largest EU countries
Abstract
Introduction: CAR T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising new immuno-oncology treatment that engages the patient's immune system to fight certain hematological malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In the European Union (EU), CAR T-cell therapies have been approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients since 2018, but patient access is often still limited or delayed. This paper is aimed at discussing challenges to access and possible solutions in the largest four EU countries.
Methods: The analysis relied on literature review, market data collection, since homogeneous data coming from registries were not available, and discussion with experts coming from all four countries.
Results: We calculated that in 2020, between 58% and 83% of R/R DLBCL patients (EMA approved label population) or between 29% and 71% of the estimated medically eligible R/R DLBCL patients, were not treated with a licensed CAR T-cell therapy. Common challenges along the patient journey that may result in limited access or delays to CAR T-cell therapy were identified. These include timely identification and referral of eligible patients, pre-treatment funding approval by authorities and payers, and resource needs at CAR T-cell centers.
Discussion: These challenges, existing best practices and recommended focus areas for health systems are discussed here, with the aim to inform necessary actions for overcoming patient access challenges for current CAR T-cell therapies as well as for future cell and gene therapies.
Keywords: CAR T-cell therapy; France; Germany; Italy; Spain; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; health system; patient access.
Copyright © 2023 Canales Albendea, Canonico, Cartron, Deiters, Jommi, Marks, Rioufol, Sancho Cia, Santoro and Wagner-Drouet.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures

References
-
- EMA (European medicines agency) [Internet] EPAR Kymriah. (2022a). Availanle at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/kymriah [Accessed May 31, 2022].
-
- EMA (European Medicines Agency) [Internet]. EPAR Yescarta. (2022b). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/yescarta [Accessed Apr 17, 2023].
-
- EMA (European Medicines Agency) [Internet]. EPAR Breyanzi. (2022c). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/breyanzi [Accessed May 31, 2022].
-
- Gilead [Internet] . Yescarta® CAR T-cell therapy quadruples median event-free survival duration over standard of care in second-line relapsed or refractory large B-Cell lymphoma. (2021). Available at: https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/press-room/press-releases/2021/9/k... [Accessed April 17, 2023].
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials