Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 31:14:1136735.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1136735. eCollection 2023.

Development of a UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-hepatocellular carcinoma drugs and analgesics in human plasma

Affiliations

Development of a UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-hepatocellular carcinoma drugs and analgesics in human plasma

Shijia Lu et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

In hepatocellular carcinoma treatment, sorafenib, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, lenvatinib, and donafenib are first-line drugs; regorafenib, apatinib, and cabozantinib are second-line drugs; and oxycodone, morphine, and fentanyl are commonly used analgesics. However, the high degree of inter- and intra-individual variability in the efficacy and toxicity of these drugs remains an urgent issue. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the most reliable technical means for evaluating drug safety and efficacy. Therefore, we developed an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous TDM of three chemotherapy drugs (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and capecitabin), six targeted drugs (sorafenib, donafenib, apatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and lenvatinib), and three analgesics (morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone). We extracted 12 analytes and isotope internal standards (ISs) from plasma samples by magnetic solid phase extraction (mSPE) and separated them using a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column with water containing 0.1% formic acid and methanol containing 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phase. The analytical performance of our method in terms of sensitivity, linearity, specificity, carryover, precision, limit of quantification, matrix effect, accuracy, dilution integrity, extraction recovery, stability, and crosstalk of all the analytes under different conditions met all the criteria stipulated by the guidelines of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The response function was estimated at 10.0-10 000.0 ng/mL for sorafenib, donafenib, apatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and lenvatinib, and 20.0-20 000.0 ng/mL for 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, capecitabin, morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone, with a correlation of > 0.9956 for all compounds. The precision and accuracy of all analytes were < 7.21% and 5.62%, respectively. Our study provides empirical support for a simple, reliable, specific, and suitable technique for clinical TDM and pharmacokinetics.

Keywords: UPLC-MS/MS; analgesics; chemotherapy and targeted drugs; hepatocellular carcinoma; human plasma; therapeutic drug monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer YQ declared a shared parent affiliation with the authors to the handling editor at the time of review.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Chemical structure diagram of OXA, 5-Fu, CAP, SOR, REG, LEN, APA, CAB, DON, FEN, OXY, and MOR.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative UPLC-MS/MS chromatograms for SOR, DON, APA, CAP, LEN, OXY, REG, MOR, OXA, 5-Fu, CAB, and FEN in human plasma samples: (A) a blank plasma sample; (B) a blank plasma sample spiked with analyte, and (C) a clinical plasma sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bardwell G., Wood E., Brar R. (2019). Fentanyl assisted treatment: A possible role in the opioid overdose epidemic? Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy 14 (1), 50. 10.1186/s13011-019-0241-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cucarull B., Tutusaus A., Rider P., Hernáez-Alsina T., Cuño C., Frutos P. G. D. (2022). Hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic advances. Cancers (Basel) 14 (3), 621. 10.3390/cancers14030621 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao J., Zhou X. P., Zhang Y. F., Gao N., Tian X., Fang Y., et al. (2016). Changes in cytochrome P450s-mediated drug clearance in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo: A bottom-up approach. Oncotarget 7 (19), 28612–28623. 10.18632/oncotarget.8704 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan J., Qin S. K., Cai X. J., Zhou J., Shen F., Wang W. L. (2022). Guidelines of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). Hepatocellular carcinoma.
    1. Kozo D., Ross M. W., Jarrah J., Barrett M., Harney R. L., Courtney J. B., et al. (2017). Rapid homogeneous immunoassay to quantify gemcitabine in plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther. Drug Monit. 39 (3), 235–242. 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000402 - DOI - PMC - PubMed