Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 21;14(9):1553-1561.
doi: 10.7150/jca.83588. eCollection 2023.

A novel nomogram based on clinical blood indicators for prognosis prediction in curatively resected esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma patients

Affiliations

A novel nomogram based on clinical blood indicators for prognosis prediction in curatively resected esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma patients

Can-Tong Liu et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) patients was increasing but their prognoses were poor. Blood-based predictive biomarkers were associated with prognosis. This study was to build a nomogram based on preoperative clinical laboratory blood biomarkers for predicting prognosis in curatively resected EJA. Methods: Curatively resected EJA patients, recruited between 2003 and 2017 in the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, were divided chronologically into the training (n=465) and validation groups (n=289). Fifty markers, involving sociodemographic characteristics and preoperative clinical laboratory blood indicators, were screened for nomogram construction. Independent predictive factors were selected using Cox regression analysis and then were combined to build a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). Results: Composed of 12 factors, including age, body mass index, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine transaminase ratio, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, uric acid, IgA, IgG, complement C3, complement factor B and systemic immune-inflammation index, we constructed a novel nomogram for OS prediction. In the training group, when combined with TNM system, it acquired a C-index of 0.71, better than using TNM system only (C-index: 0.62, p < 0.001). When applied in the validation group, the combined C-index was 0.70, also better than using TNM system (C-index: 0.62, p < 0.001). Calibration curves exhibited that the nomogram-predicted probabilities of 5-year OS were both in consistency with the actual 5-year OS in both groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis exhibited that patients with higher nomogram scores contained poorer 5-year OS than those with lower scores (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In conclusion, the novel nomogram built based on preoperative blood indicators might be the potential prognosis prediction model of curatively resected EJA.

Keywords: Clinical laboratory blood indicators; Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; Nomogram; Prediction; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment process of EJA patients. EJA: esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomogram for predicting OS of EJA patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration curves were plotted for the training (A) and validation (B) groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
IDI and NRI of the combination of the OS nomogram and TNM system in predicting 5-year OS of EJA patients for the training (A) and validation (B) groups. The red area is Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), the added predicted value. The distance between the two black dots represents net reclassification improvement (NRI).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by the log-rank test based on the training (A) and validation (B) groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. - PubMed
    1. Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1457–9. - PubMed
    1. Arnold M, Ferlay J, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018. Gut. 2020;69:1564–71. - PubMed
    1. Haga Y, Hato S, Ikenaga M, Yamamoto K, Tsuburaya A, Doi K. et al. Validation of an assessment tool: Estimation of Postoperative Overall Survival for Gastric Cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:515–23. - PubMed
    1. Kudou K, Nakashima Y, Haruta Y, Nambara S, Tsuda Y, Kusumoto E. et al. Comparison of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores Associated with the Prognostic Impact of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction and Upper Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:2059–67. - PubMed