Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 5:15:17562872231177781.
doi: 10.1177/17562872231177781. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

New multiport robotic surgical systems: a comprehensive literature review of clinical outcomes in urology

Affiliations
Review

New multiport robotic surgical systems: a comprehensive literature review of clinical outcomes in urology

Morgan Salkowski et al. Ther Adv Urol. .

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the field of robotic surgery has largely been dominated by the da Vinci robotic platform. Nevertheless, numerous novel multiport robotic surgical systems have been developed over the past decade, and some have recently been introduced into clinical practice. This nonsystematic review aims to describe novel surgical robotic systems, their individual designs, and their reported uses and clinical outcomes within the field of urologic surgery. Specifically, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of the Senhance robotic system, the CMR-Versius robotic system, and the Hugo RAS in urologic procedures. Systems with fewer published uses are also described, including the Avatera, Hintori, and Dexter. Notable features of each system are compared, with a particular emphasis on factors differentiating each system from the da Vinci robotic system.

Keywords: Avatera; Hinotori; Hugo; Revo-i; Senhance; Versius; new robotic systems; urology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
New multiport robotic surgical systems in urology: a temporal overview.

References

    1. Li KP, Wan S, Wang CY, et al.. Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ⩾ 7): an evidence-based analysis. J Robot Surg. Epub ahead of print 13 March 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01565-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang X, Wang L, Zheng X, et al.. Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 1045–1060. - PubMed
    1. Moretti TBC, Magna LA, Reis LO. Radical prostatectomy technique dispute: analyzing over 1.35 million surgeries in 20 years of history. Clin Genitourin Cancer. Epub ahead of print 16 February 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng AP, Sanaiha Y, Bakhtiyar SS, et al.. National analysis of cost disparities in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominal operations. Surgery. Epub ahead of print 21 March 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baghli A, Achit H, Audigé V, et al.. Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery vs open surgery in the context of partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumors. J Robot Surg. Epub ahead of print 15 March 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01552-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources