Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;12(14):15176-15186.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6196. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Treatment outcome comparisons of first-line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study

Affiliations

Treatment outcome comparisons of first-line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study

Yi-Hsin Liang et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a combination of one targeted therapy agent and a chemotherapy doublet. Whether bevacizumab or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is the more effective addition to a chemotherapy doublet as the first-line treatment for inoperable KRAS wild-type mCRC remains controversial in prior clinical trials. Moreover, the association between the sidedness of primary tumors and the efficacy of anti-EGFR mAb needs to be addressed.

Methods: We established a cohort of patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who were treated with first-line targeted therapy plus doublet chemotherapy between 2013 and 2018 using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Secondary surgery was defined as either resection of primary tumors, liver metastases, lung metastases, or radiofrequency ablation.

Results: A total of 6482 patients were included; bevacizumab and anti-EGFR mAb were the first-line targeted therapies in 3334 (51.4%) and 3148 (48.6%) patients, respectively. Compared with those who received bevacizumab, patients who received anti-EGFR mAb exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS; median, 23.1 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.012) and time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 11.3 vs. 10 months, p < 0.001). Among left-sided primary tumors, the OS and TTF benefits of anti-EGFR mAb remained. Among right-sided primary tumors, the OS and TTF were similar regardless of the type of targeted therapy. In multivariate analyses, first-line anti-EGFR mAb therapy remained an independent predictor of longer OS and TTF for left-sided primary tumors. Patients who received anti-EGFR mAb were more likely to receive secondary surgery (29.6% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.0001) than patients who received bevacizumab.

Conclusion: For patients who received first-line doublet chemotherapy for KRAS wild-type mCRC, adding anti-EGFR mAb was associated with significantly longer OS and TTF, especially for left-sided primary tumors.

Keywords: EGFR; bevacizumab; cetuximab; metastatic colorectal cancer; panitumumab; secondary surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors claim that there is no any conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Kaplan–Meier plots illustrating (A) overall survival and (B) time to treatment failure according to the treatment regimen. p values were determined using the log‐rank test. OS, overall survival; TTF, time to treatment failure; anti‐EGFR, anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A–B) Kaplan–Meier plots illustrating (A) overall survival and (B) time to treatment failure according to the treatment regimens of patients with left‐sided primary tumors; (C–D) Kaplan–Meier plots illustrating (C) overall survival and (D) time to treatment failure according to the treatment regimens of patients with right‐sided primary tumors. p values were determined using the log‐rank test. OS, overall survival; TTF, time to treatment failure; anti‐EGFR, anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Kaplan–Meier plots illustrating the overall survival of patients according to whether they received secondary surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA); (B–D) Kaplan–Meier plots illustrating time to secondary surgery or RFA according to the treatment regimens of the (B) whole population, (C) patients with left‐sided primary tumors, and (D) patients with right‐sided primary tumors. p values were determined using the log‐rank test. OS, overall survival; anti‐EGFR, anti‐epidermal growth factor; 2nd, secondary.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kao CW, Chiang CJ, Lin LJ, Huang CW, Lee WC, Lee MY. Accuracy of long‐form data in the Taiwan cancer registry. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:2037‐2041. - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209‐249. - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386‐1422. - PubMed
    1. Yoshino T, Arnold D, Taniguchi H, et al. Pan‐Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO‐ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:44‐70. - PubMed
    1. Innocenti F, Ou FS, Qu X, et al. Mutational analysis of patients with colorectal cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 identifies new roles of microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden for patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1217‐1227. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms