Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;36(6):ivad101.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad101.

Endoscopic aortic valve surgery in isolated and concomitant procedures

Affiliations

Endoscopic aortic valve surgery in isolated and concomitant procedures

Daniele Zoni et al. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate early outcomes of endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) and risks of concomitant procedures done through the same working port.

Methods: At our institution, we performed a data analysis of 342 consecutive patients (from July 2013 to May 2021) who underwent endoscopic AVR with or without associated major procedure. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative data were evaluated. Subsequently, we perform a comparative analysis between the isolated and concomitant surgery group. The surgical access was a 3- to 4-cm working port in the second right intercostal space and 3 additional 5-mm mini-ports for the introduction of the thoracoscope, the transthoracic clamp and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary by-pass was achieved through peripheral cannulation.

Results: 105 patients (30.7%) underwent combined procedure: 2 coronary artery bypass (1.9%), 21 ascending aorta replacement (19.6%), 41 mitral surgery (38.3%), 16 mitral and tricuspid surgery (15%) and 25 other procedure (27%). Death occurred in 1 patient (0.4%) in the isolated group versus 2 patients (1.9%) in the combined group (P = 0.175). Seven strokes were observed, 4 in isolated procedures (1.7%) and 3 in the concomitant ones (2.85%) (P = 0.481). Surgical revision for bleeding was performed always through the same access in 13 patients (5.4%) versus 11 patients (10.4%) (P = 0.096). Pacemaker implantation was necessary in 5 patients (2.1%) versus 8 patients (7.6%) (P = 0.014). Median intubation time was 5 (2) h vs 6 (8) (P < 0.080).

Conclusions: Through a single working port made for endoscopic AVR, a concomitant procedure may be done without affecting in-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rate.

Keywords: Aortic valve disease; Combined endoscopic cardiac procedures; Endoscopic aortic valve replacement; Endoscopic cardiac surgery; Mortality in endoscopic cardiac surgery; Stroke in endoscopic cardiac surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
(A) Schematic view of the operative field and the working port. (B) Rapid deployment valve. (C) Mitral valve repair. (D) Tricuspid valve repair. (E) Wound dimension at the end of surgery.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Concomitant endoscopic aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement: operative view and thoracoscopic vision (box).
None

References

    1. Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF.. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:596–7. - PubMed
    1. Young CP, Sinha S, Vohra HA.. Outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 2018;53:ii19–23. - PubMed
    1. Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D. et al. Transcatheter aorticValve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1706–15. - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Per Holm PJ. et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91. - PubMed
    1. Barili F, Freemantle N, Pilozzi Casado A, Rinaldi M, Folliguet T, Musumeci F. et al. Mortality in trials on transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a pooled metaanalysis of Kaplan–Meier-derived individual patient data. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:221–9. - PubMed