Endoscopic aortic valve surgery in isolated and concomitant procedures
- PMID: 37326963
- PMCID: PMC10371047
- DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivad101
Endoscopic aortic valve surgery in isolated and concomitant procedures
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate early outcomes of endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) and risks of concomitant procedures done through the same working port.
Methods: At our institution, we performed a data analysis of 342 consecutive patients (from July 2013 to May 2021) who underwent endoscopic AVR with or without associated major procedure. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative data were evaluated. Subsequently, we perform a comparative analysis between the isolated and concomitant surgery group. The surgical access was a 3- to 4-cm working port in the second right intercostal space and 3 additional 5-mm mini-ports for the introduction of the thoracoscope, the transthoracic clamp and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary by-pass was achieved through peripheral cannulation.
Results: 105 patients (30.7%) underwent combined procedure: 2 coronary artery bypass (1.9%), 21 ascending aorta replacement (19.6%), 41 mitral surgery (38.3%), 16 mitral and tricuspid surgery (15%) and 25 other procedure (27%). Death occurred in 1 patient (0.4%) in the isolated group versus 2 patients (1.9%) in the combined group (P = 0.175). Seven strokes were observed, 4 in isolated procedures (1.7%) and 3 in the concomitant ones (2.85%) (P = 0.481). Surgical revision for bleeding was performed always through the same access in 13 patients (5.4%) versus 11 patients (10.4%) (P = 0.096). Pacemaker implantation was necessary in 5 patients (2.1%) versus 8 patients (7.6%) (P = 0.014). Median intubation time was 5 (2) h vs 6 (8) (P < 0.080).
Conclusions: Through a single working port made for endoscopic AVR, a concomitant procedure may be done without affecting in-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rate.
Keywords: Aortic valve disease; Combined endoscopic cardiac procedures; Endoscopic aortic valve replacement; Endoscopic cardiac surgery; Mortality in endoscopic cardiac surgery; Stroke in endoscopic cardiac surgery.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Figures
References
-
- Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF.. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:596–7. - PubMed
-
- Young CP, Sinha S, Vohra HA.. Outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 2018;53:ii19–23. - PubMed
-
- Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D. et al. Transcatheter aorticValve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1706–15. - PubMed
-
- Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Per Holm PJ. et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91. - PubMed
-
- Barili F, Freemantle N, Pilozzi Casado A, Rinaldi M, Folliguet T, Musumeci F. et al. Mortality in trials on transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a pooled metaanalysis of Kaplan–Meier-derived individual patient data. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:221–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
