Evaluation of costs associated with fertility treatment leading to a live birth after one fresh transfer: A global perspective
- PMID: 37327667
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102349
Evaluation of costs associated with fertility treatment leading to a live birth after one fresh transfer: A global perspective
Abstract
Considerable costs are associated with infertility treatment, but little evidence is available on the main drivers of treatment costs. This cost analysis investigated key costs for treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and the proportion of costs attributed to the acquisition of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) alfa originator for one fresh embryo transfer (ET) leading to a live birth in Spain, Norway, the UK, Germany, Denmark, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. The total costs for one ART cycle with a fresh ET leading to a live birth varied between countries (€4108-€12,314). Costs for pregnancy and live birth were the major contributors in European countries, and the costs of oocyte retrieval, monitoring during ovarian stimulation, pregnancy, and live birth were the top contributors in the Asia-Pacific countries, included in this analysis. Acquisition costs for r-hFSH alfa originator contributed to only 5%-17% of the total costs of one ART cycle with one fresh ET leading to a live birth.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology (ART); Drug acquisition cost; Live birth; Real-world data; Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH).
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest RM has received lecture fees and grants from Merck and Ferring; support for attending scientific conferences from Gedeon Richter, Hungary, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Angelini, Italy, and Ferring, Switzerland. KFB has received honoraria or consultation fees from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Ferring, Switzerland, Bayer, Germany, Stiftung Endometriose Forschung, Germany, and Takeda, Japan and is a member of an advisory board for Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. HK and C-WC declare no relevant conflicts of interest. SI has received personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Ferring, Switzerland, and Gedeon-Richter, Hungary. VC, JES, and TDH are employees of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt Germany. CR is an employee of Pharma Value Consulting, Switzerland, and at the time of the study was a consultant for Merck, KGaA Darmstadt, Germany. RM has received a lecture fee from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; support for attending scientific conferences from Gedeon Richter, Hungary, and Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; and is the Chair of the British Fertility Society.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jun 16;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00768-3. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34134695 Free PMC article.
-
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gonadotropins Used for Ovarian Stimulation during Assisted Reproductive Technology Based on Data from the French Nationwide Claims Database (SNDS).Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(3):211-225. doi: 10.1159/000542074. Epub 2024 Nov 19. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025. PMID: 39561733
-
Originator recombinant human follitropin alfa versus recombinant human follitropin alfa biosimilars in Spain: A cost-effectiveness analysis of assisted reproductive technology related to fresh embryo transfers.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Dec;85(Pt B):203-216. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 8. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 35227619 Review.
-
The cumulative live birth rate of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alfa verse urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles.J Ovarian Res. 2022 Jun 21;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-01009-w. J Ovarian Res. 2022. PMID: 35729654 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH): recombinant human luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone in assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles among women aged 35-40 years: A German database study.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jul;89:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102350. Epub 2023 May 11. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023. PMID: 37320996 Review.
Cited by
-
Research Performance in Reproductive Biomedicine: A National Scientometrics Study.Int J Fertil Steril. 2023 Nov 7;18(1):1-6. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.1995671.1446. Int J Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 38041452 Free PMC article.
-
Crossing the barrier or how regulation of ovastacin controls fertilization and translates into clinical phenotypes.iScience. 2025 Jul 1;28(8):112976. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112976. eCollection 2025 Aug 15. iScience. 2025. PMID: 40697826 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Introducing artificial intelligence and sperm epigenetics in the fertility clinic: a novel foundation for diagnostics and prediction modelling.Front Reprod Health. 2025 Feb 27;7:1506312. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1506312. eCollection 2025. Front Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 40083331 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources