Are tunas relevant bioindicators of mercury concentrations in the global ocean?
- PMID: 37328690
- DOI: 10.1007/s10646-023-02679-y
Are tunas relevant bioindicators of mercury concentrations in the global ocean?
Abstract
Humans are exposed to toxic methylmercury mainly by consuming marine fish. The Minamata Convention aims at reducing anthropogenic mercury releases to protect human and ecosystem health, employing monitoring programs to meet its objectives. Tunas are suspected to be sentinels of mercury exposure in the ocean, though not evidenced yet. Here, we conducted a literature review of mercury concentrations in tropical tunas (bigeye, yellowfin, and skipjack) and albacore, the four most exploited tunas worldwide. Strong spatial patterns of tuna mercury concentrations were shown, mainly explained by fish size, and methylmercury bioavailability in marine food web, suggesting that tunas reflect spatial trends of mercury exposure in their ecosystem. The few mercury long-term trends in tunas were contrasted and sometimes disconnected to estimated regional changes in atmospheric emissions and deposition, highlighting potential confounding effects of legacy mercury, and complex reactions governing the fate of mercury in the ocean. Inter-species differences of tuna mercury concentrations associated with their distinct ecology suggest that tropical tunas and albacore could be used complementarily to assess the vertical and horizontal variability of methylmercury in the ocean. Overall, this review elevates tunas as relevant bioindicators for the Minamata Convention, and calls for large-scale and continuous mercury measurements within the international community. We provide guidelines for tuna sample collection, preparation, analyses and data standardization with recommended transdisciplinary approaches to explore tuna mercury content in parallel with observation abiotic data, and biogeochemical model outputs. Such global and transdisciplinary biomonitoring is essential to explore the complex mechanisms of the marine methylmercury cycle.
Keywords: Biomonitoring; Methylmercury; Minamata Convention; Spatial gradients; Standardized monitoring guidelines; Temporal trends.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- AMAP, 2021. AMAP Assessment 2021: Mercury in the Arctic. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment (AMAP). Tromso, Norway
-
- Angot H, Hoffman N, Giang A, Thackray CP, Hendricks AN, Urban NR, Selin NE (2018) Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts. Environ Sci Technol 52:12968–12977. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04542 - DOI
-
- Axelrad DA, Bellinger DC, Ryan LM, Woodruff TJ (2007) Dose–Response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: An integrative analysis of epidemiologic data. Environ Health Perspectives 115:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9303 - DOI
-
- Barbosa RV, Point D, Médieu A, Allain V, Gillikin DP, Couturier LIE, Munaron J-M, Roupsard F, Lorrain A (2022) Mercury concentrations in tuna blood and muscle mirror seawater methylmercury in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Marine Pollut Bull 180:113801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113801 - DOI
-
- Bearhop S, Ruxton GD, Furness RW (2000) Dynamics of mercury in blood and feathers of great skuas. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1638–1643. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620190622 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical