Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;130(10):1037-1045.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Eye Care Utilization in a National Sample of People with Diabetes

Affiliations

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Eye Care Utilization in a National Sample of People with Diabetes

Claudia Taccheri et al. Ophthalmology. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association of social determinants of health (SDoH) with eye care utilization among people with diabetes mellitus using the 2013-2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Participants: Participants ≥ 18 years of age with self-reported diabetes.

Methods: The SDoH in the following domains were used: (1) economic stability; (2) neighborhood, physical environment, and social cohesion; (3) community and social context; (4) food environment; (5) education; and (6) health care system. An aggregate SDoH score was calculated and divided into quartiles, with Q4 representing those with the highest adverse SDoH burden. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association of SDoH quartile with eye care utilization in the preceding 12 months. A linear trend test was conducted. Domain-specific mean SDoH scores were calculated, and the performance of domain-specific models was compared using area under the curve (AUC).

Main outcome measure: Eye care utilization in the preceding 12 months.

Results: Of 20 807 adults with diabetes, 43% had not used eye care. Greater adverse SDoH burden was associated with decrements in odds of eye care utilization (P < 0.001 for trend). Participants in the highest quartile of adverse SDoH burden (Q4) had a 58% lower odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.47) of eye care utilization than those in Q1. The domain-specific model using economic stability had the highest performing AUC (0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64).

Conclusions: Among a national sample of people with diabetes, adverse SDoH were associated with decreased eye care utilization. Evaluating and intervening upon the effects of adverse SDoH may be a means by which to improve eye care utilization and prevent vision loss.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Keywords: Diabetes; Diabetic eye disease; Diabetic retinopathy; Eye care utilization; Health equity; Social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Published 2010. Accessed January 1, 2022. https://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/Conceptualframeworkforaction...
    1. Nwanyanwu KH, Newman-Casey PA, Gardner TW, Lim JI. Beyond HbA1c: Environmental Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2015;6(2):1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot M Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1099–1104. - PubMed
    1. Hill-Briggs F, Adler NE, Berkowitz SA, et al. Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review. Diabetes Care. 2020;44(1):258–279. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Artiga S, Hinton E. Beyond Health Care: The Role of Social Determinants in Promoting Health and Health Equity. Published 2005. Accessed March 25, 2021. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/beyond-h...

Publication types