Participant perceptions of changes in psychosocial domains following participation in an adaptive deep brain stimulation trial
- PMID: 37330169
- PMCID: PMC10529988
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.06.007
Participant perceptions of changes in psychosocial domains following participation in an adaptive deep brain stimulation trial
Abstract
Background: There has been substantial controversy in the neuroethics literature regarding the extent to which deep brain stimulation (DBS) impacts dimensions of personality, mood, and behavior.
Objective/hypothesis: Despite extensive debate in the theoretical literature, there remains a paucity of empirical data available to support or refute claims related to the psychosocial changes following DBS.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used to examine the perspectives of patients who underwent DBS regarding changes to their personality, authenticity, autonomy, risk-taking, and overall quality of life.
Results: Patients (n = 21) who were enrolled in adaptive DBS trials for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette's syndrome, or dystonia participated. Qualitative data revealed that participants, in general, reported positive experiences with alterations in what was described as 'personality, mood, and behavior changes.' The majority of participants reported increases in quality of life. No participants reported 'regretting the decision to undergo DBS.'
Conclusion(s): The findings from this patient sample do not support the narrative that DBS results in substantial adverse changes to dimensions of personality, mood, and behavior. Changes reported as "negative" or "undesired" were few in number, and transient in nature.
Keywords: Deep brain stimulation; Ethics; Neuroethics; Neuromodulation; Neurotechnology; Personality.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Deep brain stimulation and the role of the neuropsychologist.Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;21(1):162-89. doi: 10.1080/13825580601025940. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007. PMID: 17366283
-
Reoperation for suboptimal outcomes after deep brain stimulation surgery.Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4):754-60; discussion 760-1. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325492.58799.35. Neurosurgery. 2008. PMID: 18981887
-
Deep brain stimulation: current status.Neurol India. 2015 Jan-Feb;63(1):9-18. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.152623. Neurol India. 2015. PMID: 25751463 Review.
-
Prediction of depression and anxiety via patient-assessed tremor severity, not physician-reported motor symptom severity, in patients with Parkinson's disease or essential tremor who have undergone deep brain stimulation.J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1562-1571. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.JNS1733. Epub 2018 Feb 23. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29473781
-
Deep brain stimulation: foundations and future trends.Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018 Jan 1;23(1):162-182. doi: 10.2741/4586. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018. PMID: 28930542 Review.
Cited by
-
The Potential Harms of Speculative Neuroethics Research.AJOB Neurosci. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):418-421. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2257170. Epub 2023 Oct 19. AJOB Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37856347 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ethical considerations for integrating multimodal computer perception and neurotechnology.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 16;18:1332451. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1332451. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38435745 Free PMC article.
-
Deep brain stimulation and Parkinson disease: a bibliometric and visual analysis (1993-2023).Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 7;48(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03178-w. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 39762644
-
The range and reach of qualitative research in neurosurgery: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 21;20(8):e0330770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330770. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40839612 Free PMC article.
-
Identity Theft, Deep Brain Stimulation, and the Primacy of Post-trial Obligations.Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Jan;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1002/hast.1567. Hastings Cent Rep. 2024. PMID: 38390681 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Volkmann J, Allert N, Voges J, Weiss PH, Freund HJ, & Sturm V (2001). Safety and efficacy of pallidal or subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced PD. Neurology, 56(4), 548–551. - PubMed
-
- Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Kagnoff MN, Jimenez-Shahed J, Fekete R, & Jankovic J (2014). The safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: 10 years and beyond. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 85(5), 567–572. - PubMed
-
- Cruz S, Gutiérrez-Rojas L, González-Domenech P, Díaz-Atienza F, Martínez-Ortega JM, & Jiménez-Fernández S (2022). Deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Results from meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 317, 114869. - PubMed