Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 17;14(1):3611.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39299-3.

Spatiotemporal resolution of germinal center Tfh cell differentiation and divergence from central memory CD4+ T cell fate

Affiliations

Spatiotemporal resolution of germinal center Tfh cell differentiation and divergence from central memory CD4+ T cell fate

Fangming Zhu et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Follicular helper T (Tfh) cells are essential for germinal center (GC) B cell responses. However, it is not clear which PD-1+CXCR5+Bcl6+CD4+ T cells will differentiate into PD-1hiCXCR5hiBcl6hi GC-Tfh cells and how GC-Tfh cell differentiation is regulated. Here, we report that the sustained Tigit expression in PD-1+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells marks the precursor Tfh (pre-Tfh) to GC-Tfh transition, whereas Tigit-PD-1+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells upregulate IL-7Rα to become CXCR5+CD4+ T memory cells with or without CCR7. We demonstrate that pre-Tfh cells undergo substantial further differentiation at the transcriptome and chromatin accessibility levels to become GC-Tfh cells. The transcription factor c-Maf appears critical in governing the pre-Tfh to GC-Tfh transition, and we identify Plekho1 as a stage-specific downstream factor regulating the GC-Tfh competitive fitness. In summary, our work identifies an important marker and regulatory mechanism of PD-1+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells during their developmental choice between memory T cell fate and GC-Tfh cell differentiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Sustained Tigit expression in CXCR5+CD4+ T cells is associated with GC-Tfh cell differentiation.
ac Bcl6-protein reporter mice were intranasally infected with PR8. a At days 6–7, 14, and 28 p.i., the NP+CD44hiCD4+ T cells in the medLN were analyzed for PD-1 and CXCR5 staining. b Confocal microscopy analysis of expression of CD4 (blue), GL7 (green), and IgD (white) in the medLN was performed at days 6–7 and 14 p.i. Scale bars, 400 μm. c Indicated populations of NP+CD44hiCD4+ T cells at days 6–7, 14, and 28 p.i. were analyzed for tdTomato (tdTo, Bcl6-reporter) expression (days 6–7, n = 4; day 14, n = 4; day 28, n = 4). df Purified OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. (d) Naïve OT-II and donor OT-II at day 7 p.i. and (e) indicated donor cell populations at days 15 and 21 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for Tigit staining (day 7, n = 4; day 15, n = 5; day 21, n = 5). f Indicated donor cell populations at day 21 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for Bcl6 intracellular staining (n = 5). g Purified OT-II cells from OT-IITgBcl6f/f or OT-IITgBcl6f/fCD4-CreTg mice were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Indicated donor cell populations in the medLN were analyzed for Tigit, PD-1, and CXCR5 staining at days 6 and 14 p.i. Data in ag are representative (or pooled) results of at least two independent experiments. Bars represent average ±SD. The P-values were determined by a two-tailed unpaired t-test (d), a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (e, f), or a two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (c). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Tigit+CD4+ T cell localization and regulation of Tigit expression in activated CD4+ T cells.
a, b Purified CD45.2+ OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ C57BL/6 recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Confocal microscopy analysis of expression of Tigit (green), CD45.2 (red), GL7 (blue), and IgD (white) in the medLN was performed at days 7 (a) and 14 (b) p.i. Insets of the T/B border (i), B cell follicle (ii), and GC (iii), as indicated, are shown at higher magnification, with each arrow (pointing to yellow) representing a cell stained with both Tigit and CD45.2. Scale bars, 50 μm and 25 μm (for zoom-in views) in a, and 100 μm and 50 μm (for zoom-in views) in b. c, d Purified CD4+ T cells from C57BL/6 mice were activated in vitro with anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies. Tigit staining was analyzed in: c naïve cells (Day 0), day 1 activated cells (Day 1), day 2 activated cells (Continue activation), and cells stimulated for 1 day, followed by transfer of cells to a new well for another day without further stimulation (Detach), and d CD4+ T cells activated for 2 days (Day 2) and expanded in culture for 2 days (Day 4), then re-stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies overnight (Day 5). Data in ad are representative results of at least two independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Transcriptome and chromatin accessibility analyses in Tfh cell differentiation.
Purified OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. ac Donor OT-II cells at day 21 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed by RNA-seq. a Clustered heatmap of naïve and indicated donor cell populations. b Venn diagram of DEGs and c IPA for the indicated comparisons. d, e Donor OT-II cells at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed by ATAC-seq. d Clustered heatmap of naïve and indicated donor cell populations. e Transcription factor binding motif enrichment in ATAC-seq peak clusters from Fig. 3d (top), with RNA-seq gene expression of selected transcription factor family members (bottom). f GSEA of indicated donor cell populations using published Th1, Tcmp, and GC-Tfh signature gene sets. RNA-seq and ATAC-seq samples are independent biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. The divergent differentiation of Tigit and Tigit+ PD-1+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells.
a, b Purified OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Indicated donor cell populations at day 28 p.i. in the medLN (a) or spleen (b) were analyzed for PD-1, CXCR5, Tigit, and IL-7Rα staining (n = 11). ce CD45.1+CD45.2+ and CD45.1+ C57BL/6 mice were intranasally infected with PR8. CD45.1+CD45.2+CD44+Tigit+IL-7RαPD-1+CXCR5+ (Tigit+IL-7Rα) and CD45.1+CD44+TigitIL-7Rα+PD-1+CXCR5+ (TigitIL-7Rα+) CD4+ T cells at day 14 p.i. were sorted and co-transferred into CD45.2+ C57BL/6 recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8. c Ratio of the two donor cell populations (left panel) and Tigit and IL-7Rα expression on indicated donor cell populations (right panel) before transfer. d Ratio of the two donor cell populations (left panel) and quantification of relative percentages at day 14 p.i. (right panel, n = 8). e Donor CD4+ T cells at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for PD-1 and CXCR5 staining, with quantification of indicated populations and PD-1hiCXCR5hi GC-Tfh to PD-1+CXCR5+ cell ratios (n = 8). Data in ae are representative (or pooled) results of at least two independent experiments. Bars represent average ±SD. The P-values were determined by a two-tailed paired t-test (d, e), or a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (a, b). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Central memory phenotype induction in CXCR5 and CXCR5+ IL-7Rα+CD4+ T cells.
ac Purified OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Indicated donor cell populations at day 28 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for CXCR6 and Ly6c staining (a) and Psgl-1 staining (b). c Indicated donor OT-II populations at day 28 p.i. in the medLN and spleen were analyzed for CD62L and CCR7 staining (n = 11). d Purified CD45.1+ OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.2+ C57BL/6 recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Indicated donor OT-II populations at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for CD62L and CCR7 staining (n = 3). e C57BL/6 mice were intranasally immunized with KLH-GP61-80 and LPS. Indicated GP+ populations at day 35 p.i. in the spleen were analyzed for CD62L and CCR7 staining (n = 5). Data in ae are representative (or pooled) results of at least two independent experiments. Bars represent average ±SD. The P-values were determined by a two-tailed unpaired t-test (b, d, e), or a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (c). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. c-Maf is a critical regulator of pre- to GC-Tfh cell differentiation.
a Venn diagram of genes in RNA-seq Cluster A and gene loci in ATAC-seq Cluster 3 from Figs. 3a and 3d, respectively. b IPA of List I and List II genes from Fig. 6a. c Expression heatmap of select genes from List I and List II. d Donor OT-II cells at day 14 p.i. in the medLN of PR8-OVA-infected recipient mice were analyzed by real time RT-PCR for Maf mRNA levels (n = 3). e ATAC-seq read density at the Maf gene locus of naïve and indicated donor cell populations as in Fig. 3d. f Purified OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Donor OT-II cells at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for PD-1 and CXCR5 staining (left), and indicated populations were analyzed for c-Maf intracellular staining (right, n = 3). g CRISPR/Cas9 was used to delete Thy1 (CD90-CRISPR) or Maf (c-Maf-CRISPR) in purified OT-II cells from CD45.1+CD45.2+ OT-IITg or CD45.2+ OT-IITg mice, respectively. CD90-CRISPR and c-Maf-CRISPR OT-II cells were co-transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Donor OT-II cells at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for PD-1 and CXCR5 staining (n = 10). Data in d, f, g are representative (or pooled) results of two independent experiments. Bars represent average ±SD. The P-values were determined by a two-tailed paired t-test (g), or a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (d, f). RNA-seq and ATAC-seq samples are independent biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Plekho1 plays a stage-specific role in regulating the competitive fitness of GC-Tfh cells.
a Purified OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA. Indicated donor cell populations at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed by real time RT-PCR for Plekho1 mRNA levels (n = 3). b ATAC-seq read density at the Plekho1 gene locus of naïve and indicated donor cell populations as in Fig. 3d. c Purified CD4+ T cells from C57BL/6 mice were activated in vitro and infected with control retrovirus (RV-Ctrl) or retrovirus expressing Maf (RV-c-Maf) under Th0 and Tfh-like culture conditions. On day 4, retrovirally infected cells were sorted and analyzed by real time RT-PCR for Plekho1 mRNA levels (n = 3). dh Purified OT-II cells from CD45.1+CD45.2+ and CD45.2+ OT-IITg mice were activated in vitro and infected with retrovirus expressing shRNAmir against CD19 (shCD19, CD45.1+CD45.2+) and Plekho1 (shPlekho1, CD45.2+). Retrovirally infected OT-II cells were co-transferred into CD45.1+ SMARTA recipient mice followed by intranasal infection with PR8-OVA two days after cell transfer. d Donor OT-II cells at days 14 and 21 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed for PD-1 and CXCR5 staining (day 14, n = 4; day 21, n = 8). eg Donor OT-II cells at day 14 p.i. in the medLN were analyzed by RNA-seq. e Clustered heatmap of shCD19 and shPlekho1 GC-Tfh cells. f Numbers and percentages of potential Foxo1 targets in Cluster i and Cluster ii genes from Fig. 7e. g Enrichr enrichment analysis of transcription factors associated with DEGs in Fig. 7e. h ImageStream analysis of Foxo1 sublocation in GC-Tfh cells 30 min after stimulation with anti-CD3/ICOS antibodies (n = 7). Scale bars, 12 μm. Data in a, c, d, h are representative (or pooled) results of two independent experiments. Bars represent average ±SD. The P-values were determined by a two-tailed paired t-test (d, h), a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (a), or a two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (c). RNA-seq and ATAC-seq samples are independent biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Vinuesa CG, Tangye SG, Moser B, Mackay CR. Follicular B helper T cells in antibody responses and autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5:853–865. doi: 10.1038/nri1714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crotty S. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH) Annu Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:621–663. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101400. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cannons JL, et al. Optimal germinal center responses require a multistage T cell:B cell adhesion process involving integrins, SLAM-associated protein, and CD84. Immunity. 2010;32:253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.01.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi YS, et al. ICOS receptor instructs T follicular helper cell versus effector cell differentiation via induction of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6. Immunity. 2011;34:932–946. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerfoot SM, et al. Germinal center B cell and T follicular helper cell development initiates in the interfollicular zone. Immunity. 2011;34:947–960. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances