Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 19;45(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3.

Application of Tinel's test combed with clinical neurosensory test distinguishes spontaneous healing of lingual nerve neuropathy after mandibular third molar extraction

Affiliations

Application of Tinel's test combed with clinical neurosensory test distinguishes spontaneous healing of lingual nerve neuropathy after mandibular third molar extraction

Shigeyuki Fujita et al. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Extraction of the mandibular third molar, the most frequent and important surgical procedure in the clinical practice of oral surgery, is associated with the risk of injury of the lingual nerve. Neuropathy of the lingual nerve poses diagnostic challenges regarding the transient or permanent nature of the injury. No consensus or criteria have been established regarding the diagnosis of lingual nerve neuropathy. We applied both Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together, which can be easily used at the bedside in the early stages of injury. Therefore, we propose a new method to differentiate between lesions with the ability to heal spontaneously and those that cannot heal without surgery.

Results: Thirty-three patients (29 women, 4 men; mean age, 35.5 years) were included in this study. For all patients, the median interval between nerve injury and initial examination was 1.6 months and that between nerve injury and the second examination before determining the need for surgical management was 4.5 months. The patients were assigned to either group A or B. The spontaneous healing group (group A, n = 10) revealed a tendency for recovery within 6 months after tooth extraction. In this group, although there were individual differences in the degree of recovery, a remarkable tendency for recovery was observed based on clinical neurosensory testing in all cases. None of the patients were diagnosed with allodynia. In seven cases, the Tinel test result was negative at the first inspection, and in three cases, the result changed to negative at the second inspection. Conversely, in group B(n = 23), no recovery trend was observed with regard to clinical neurosensory testing, and nine patients had allodynia. Further, the Tinel test result was positive for all patients in both examinations.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that in case of transient lingual nerve paralysis, clinical neurosensory testing findings deteriorate immediately after tooth extraction and gradually recover, while Tinel's test shows a negative result. Using Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together enabled early and easy identification of the severity of the lingual nerve disorder and of lesions that would heal spontaneously without surgical management.

Keywords: Clinical neurosensory testing; Lingual nerve disturbance; Mandibular third molar extraction; Microneurosurgery; Spontaneous healing; Tinel’s test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Manipulation of Tinel test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram of Clinical neurosensory testing

References

    1. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:185–192. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mason DA. Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:290–294. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80005-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert RC, Bacchett PB, Pogrel MA. Frequency of trigeminal nerve injuries following third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:732–735. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kushnerev E, Yates JM. Evidence-based outcomes following inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury and repair: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:786–802. doi: 10.1111/joor.12313. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziccardi VB, Rivera L, Gomes J. Comparison of lingual and inferior alveolar nerve microsurgery outcomes. Quintessence Int. 2009;40:295–301. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources