Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2223750.
doi: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2223750.

A PDGFRB- and CD40-targeting bispecific AffiMab induces stroma-targeted immune cell activation

Affiliations

A PDGFRB- and CD40-targeting bispecific AffiMab induces stroma-targeted immune cell activation

Alessandro Mega et al. MAbs. 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

CD40 agonism by systemic administration of CD40 monoclonal antibodies has been explored in clinical trials for immunotherapy of cancer, uncovering enormous potential, but also dosing challenges in terms of systemic toxicity. CD40-dependent activation of antigen presenting cells is dependent on crosslinking of the CD40 receptor. Here we exploited this requisite by coupling crosslinking to cancer-receptor density by dual-targeting of CD40 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB), which is highly expressed in the stroma of various types of tumors. A novel PDGFRBxCD40 Fc-silenced bispecific AffiMab was developed to this end to test whether it is possible to activate CD40 in a PDGFRB-targeted manner. A PDGFRB-binding Affibody molecule was fused to each heavy chain of an Fc-silenced CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody to obtain a bispecific "AffiMab". Binding of the AffiMab to both PDGFRB and CD40 was confirmed by surface plasmon resonance, bio-layer interferometry and flow cytometry, through analysis of cells expressing respective target. In a reporter assay, the AffiMab displayed increased CD40 potency in the presence of PDGFRB-conjugated beads, in a manner dependent on PDGFRB amount/bead. To test the concept in immunologically relevant systems with physiological levels of CD40 expression, the AffiMab was tested in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) and B cells. Expression of activation markers was increased in moDCs specifically in the presence of PDGFRB-conjugated beads upon AffiMab treatment, while the Fc-silenced CD40 mAb did not stimulate CD40 activation. As expected, the AffiMab did not activate moDCs in the presence of unconjugated beads. Finally, in a co-culture experiment, the AffiMab activated moDCs and B cells in the presence of PDGFRB-expressing cells, but not in co-cultures with PDGFRB-negative cells. Collectively, these results suggest the possibility to activate CD40 in a PDGFRB-targeted manner in vitro. This encourages further investigation and the development of such an approach for the treatment of solid cancers.

Keywords: CD40; Cancer; PDGFRB; immuno-oncology; microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Mega, E. Ryer, A. Sköld, A. Sandegren, E. Backström Rydin and F.Y. Frejd are employed at Affibody AB. A. Mebrahtu, G. Aniander, J. Rockberg and A. Östman have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ZPDGFRb_3 binds PDGFRB without inducing receptor activation or internalization. (a) MG − 63 cell lines are positively stained by an anti-PDGFRB antibody via a secondary FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-conjugated secondary antibody, compared to FITC-conjugated secondary antibody alone. (b) ZPDGFRb_3 binds MG − 63 cells when compared to an Affibody molecule binding an irrelevant target. (c) BUD − 8 cell line is stimulated with PDGF-BB (PDGFRB natural ligand) or ZPDGFRb_3 and cell proliferation is assessed after 48 hours. ZPDGFRb_3 does not stimulate cell proliferation when compared to the natural ligand. (d) BJhTERT cells are treated with either ZPDGFRb_3 or PDGF-BB, at 37°C or on ice to assess PDGFRB activation and internalization-dependent degradation by western blot. Receptor phosphorylation (P-Tyr) is observed in the presence of PDGF-BB but not with ZPDGFRb_3 (performed on ice to prevent receptor internalization). Lower levels of PDGFRB due to receptor internalization-dependent degradation are observed in presence of PDGF-BB but not with ZPDGFRb_3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The bispecific PDGFRBxCD40 AffiMab binds both PDGFRB and CD40. (a) the AffiMab is designed from a CD40 agonistic, LALAPG-mutated antibody (unable of binding the FcγR). One ZPDGFRb_3 is linked to the C-terminus of each heavy chain. (b) the binding properties of the AffiMab are tested against CD40 and PDGFRB by SPR. (c) Simultaneous binding of the AffiMab toward PDGFRB and CD40 confirmed by BLI. (d) All the three molecules in (a) bind the CD40 expressing cell line HEK (human embryonic kidney)-Blue CD40L while only the AffiMab binds PDGFRB expressing cells MG − 63, assessed by flow cytometry.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
PDGFRB-targeted CD40 activation in HEK-Blue CD40L reporter gene cell assay. (a) Schematic illustration of the assay using HEK-Blue CD40L cells as reporter gene cell assay with either PDGFRB-conjugated, PDGFRB-conjugated beads in different ratios with Chicken IgY and unconjugated beads or mono and co-cultures in presence of the AffiMab. (b) CD40 activation occurs at lower AffiMab concentrations in presence of PDGFRB conjugated beads compared to unconjugated beads. (c) PDGFRB-targeted CD40 activation is dependent on PDGFRB availability/density on the beads. Beads were used with PDGFRB at a ratio of 1/4, 2/4, or 3/4 of the total amount of protein bound to the beads. An anti-chicken IgY biotinylated antibody was used to occupy the beads together with PDGFRB. Beads carrying only PDGFRB or anti-chicken IgY antibody were also included. The CD40 activation signal intensity dependent on PDGFRB availability on the beads. Mean and standard deviation of one representative experiment of at least two independent replicates are displayed on (B-C). (d) MG − 63 Co-culture (f). NIH − 3T3 Co-culture. Mean and standard deviation of two independent replicates shown (D-E).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
AffiMab mediated, PDGFRB-dependent CD40 activation in moDcs. (a) in a similar fashion as in Figure 2a, the AffiMab is evaluated on moDcs in presence of PDGFRB-conjugated or unconjugated beads. The CD40 mAb-LALAPG is also tested in the presence of PDGFRB-conjugated beads. The same experiment is repeated using BJhTERT cells as source of PDGFRB, performing a mono and co-culture. (b) Only the AffiMab activates moDcs in bead-based set-up specifically in presence of PDGFRB, as measured by upregulation of CD86 in flow cytometry. (c) CD86 is upregulated on moDcs following AffiMab treatment only in presence of PDGFRB expressing cells. Average mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of one representative experiment of at least two independent replicates is displayed on (B-C).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
AffiMab mediated, PDGFRB-dependent CD40 activation in B cells. (a) B cells are co-cultured with either PDGFRB+ BJhTERT or PDGFRB A431 cells in presence of the AffiMab. (b) PDGFRB expression is evaluated on BJhTERT and A431 cells by flow cytometry. The former is confirmed PDGFRB+ as also shown by western blot data in Figure 1D. A431 cells are identified as PDGFRB. Unstained cells are included as negative control. (c) CD86 fraction of CD20+ B cells is higher at lower AffiMab concentrations when PDGFRB is provided by cells. One representative experiment of at least two independent replicates is plotted with CD86+ cells (on CD20+ B cells) calculated on at least 1 × 104 collected cell events.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
PDGFRB immunohistochemical staining of clinical tumor specimens. Staining settings: PDGFRB-DAB (brown) and Hematoxilin (blue). (a) Representative tumor cores of a tumor TMA, showing different patterns of PDGFRB in the tumor stroma. (b) Quantification of PDGFRB fraction (positive staining area as percentage tumor core area) showing overall representation of PDGFRB staining across different tumor types.

References

    1. Eliopoulos AG. The role of the CD40 pathway in the pathogenesis and treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2004;4:360–11. PMID: 15251129. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2004.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monteran L, Erez N. The dark side of fibroblasts: cancer-associated fibroblasts as mediators of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1835. PMID: 31428105. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01835. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards DM, Sefrin JP, Gieffers C, Hill O, Merz C. Concepts for agonistic targeting of CD40 in immuno-oncology. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16:377–87. PMID: 31403344. doi:10.1080/21645515.2019.1653744. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu L, Wu Y, Ye K, Cai M, Zhuang G, Wang J. Antibody-targeted TNFRSF activation for cancer immunotherapy: the role of fcgammariib cross-linking. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:924197. PMID: 35865955. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.924197. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beatty GL, Li Y, Long KB. Cancer immunotherapy: activating innate and adaptive immunity through CD40 agonists. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17:175–86. PMID: 27927088. doi:10.1080/14737140.2017.1270208. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances