Effects of subconjunctival ropivacaine, liposomal bupivacaine, and mepivacaine on corneal sensitivity in healthy horses
- PMID: 37332132
- DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13980
Effects of subconjunctival ropivacaine, liposomal bupivacaine, and mepivacaine on corneal sensitivity in healthy horses
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate corneal sensitivity and adverse events following subconjunctival administration of three local anesthetics in horses.
Study design: Randomized, masked, crossover study.
Animals: Twelve healthy adult mares.
Methods: The subconjunctival space of the treated eye was injected with 0.2 mL of liposomal bupivacaine (1.3%), ropivacaine (0.5%), or mepivacaine (2%). All horses received each medication once and the contralateral eye received saline (control). Corneal touch threshold (CTT) was measured using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer before sedation, after sedation, and at specified intervals until it returned to baseline. Ocular examinations were performed at 24-, 72, and 168 h post-injection to monitor for adverse effects.
Results: The mean total time of anesthesia (TTA) was 168.3 min for ropivacaine, 169.2 min for liposomal bupivacaine, 103.3 min for mepivacaine and 30.7 min for the control. TTA for liposomal bupivacaine (p < .001) and ropivacaine (p = .001) was longer than the control. TTA for mepivacaine was not different from the control (p = .138), liposomal bupivacaine (p = .075) or ropivacaine (p = .150). Injection site hemorrhage reduced TTA regardless of treatments (p = .047). No adverse effects attributed to injections were noted.
Conclusion: All three medications were well tolerated. Subconjunctival administration of ropivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine resulted in longer TTAs compared to the control; however, their TTAs were not different from that of mepivacaine.
Clinical significance: Subconjunctivally administered liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine are viable options to provide prolonged corneal analgesia in horses. Future studies are needed to assess the efficacy in diseased eyes.
© 2023 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kalf KL, Utter ME, Wotman KL. Evaluation of duration of corneal anesthesia induced with ophthalmic 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride by use of a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer in clinically normal horses. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69(12):1655-1658. doi:10.2460/ajvr.69.12.1655
-
- Sharrow-Reabe KL, Townsend WM. Effects of action of proparacaine and tetracaine topical ophthalmic formulations on corneal sensitivity in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;241(12):1645-1649. doi:10.2460/javma.241.12.1645
-
- Pucket JD, Allbaugh RA, Rankin AJ, Ou Z, Bello NM. Comparison of efficacy and duration of effect on corneal sensitivity among anesthetic agents following ocular administration in clinically normal horses. Am J Vet Res. 2013;74(3):459-464. doi:10.2460/ajvr.74.3.459
-
- Swaminathan A, Otterness K, Milne K, Rezaie S. The safety of topical anesthetics in the treatment of corneal abrasions: A review. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(5):810-815. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.069
-
- Epstein DL, Paton D. Keratitis from misuse of corneal anesthetics. N Engl J Med. 1968;279(8):396-399. doi:10.1056/nejm196808222790802
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources